2000
DOI: 10.35371/kjoem.2000.12.2.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Related factors of high frequency hearing loss in the noise-exposed male workers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjects with fasting blood glucose over 125 mg/dL and those taking anti-diabetic medications and with a self-reported history of diabetes were defined as the DM group [1518]. Blood pressure was analyzed as a continuous variable by calculating the mean arterial pressure () which reflects the average effective pressure [22]. Smoking history was classified as smokers or non-smokers, in which smokers were defined as those participants who had smoked more than 100 cigarettes and those who currently smoked cigarettes [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects with fasting blood glucose over 125 mg/dL and those taking anti-diabetic medications and with a self-reported history of diabetes were defined as the DM group [1518]. Blood pressure was analyzed as a continuous variable by calculating the mean arterial pressure () which reflects the average effective pressure [22]. Smoking history was classified as smokers or non-smokers, in which smokers were defined as those participants who had smoked more than 100 cigarettes and those who currently smoked cigarettes [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the related occupational disease monitoring systems are still in a fragmented state, and most of these systems cannot be connected, which has a negative impact on the application of data sources. More importantly, in research on high frequency hearing loss (HFHL), there has been more focus on descriptive statistics [11] or risk factor assessment [12] . As a result, there are fewer developed research tools for the assessment of occupational hearing loss, which has caused a major obstacle for obtaining surveillance data and implementing preventive practices, reducing the efficient application of supervision and early warning systems [13] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%