2017
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.68.2740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relapsed or Refractory Double-Expressor and Double-Hit Lymphomas Have Inferior Progression-Free Survival After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation

Abstract: , and BCL6 and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC were performed. In cases with MYC rearrangement or copy gain, FISH for BCL2 and BCL6 was also performed. Results A total of 117 patients were included; 44% had DEL and 10% had DHL. DEL and DHL were associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS), and DHL was associated with poorer overall survival (OS). The 4-year PFS in patients with DEL compared with those with non-DEL was 48% versus 59% (P = .049), and the 4-year OS was 56% versus 67%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
128
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
128
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…60 In a recently published larger series of 117 patients examining the role of ASCT in double-expressor and double-hit lymphomas, the outcome of patients with doubleexpressor and double-hit lymphoma was dismal (4-year progressionfree survival, 0%). 61 These results emphasize the importance of dedicated trials, including double-hit patients in the relapsed setting. 62 Based on these results, if a patient with double-hit lymphoma were treated with intensive induction and still experienced progressive disease, I would refer them to a clinical trial involving novel agents rather than try conventional salvage therapy.…”
Section: Relapsed Double-hit Lymphoma and Novel Agentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…60 In a recently published larger series of 117 patients examining the role of ASCT in double-expressor and double-hit lymphomas, the outcome of patients with doubleexpressor and double-hit lymphoma was dismal (4-year progressionfree survival, 0%). 61 These results emphasize the importance of dedicated trials, including double-hit patients in the relapsed setting. 62 Based on these results, if a patient with double-hit lymphoma were treated with intensive induction and still experienced progressive disease, I would refer them to a clinical trial involving novel agents rather than try conventional salvage therapy.…”
Section: Relapsed Double-hit Lymphoma and Novel Agentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although DE-DLBCL and HGBL-DH were each associated with an inferior outcome, patients with concurrent HGBL-DH and DE-DLBCL all experienced an early lymphoma relapse within months of the transplant. 63 Approximately 20% to 30% of patients with HGBL-DH have primary refractory disease, despite receiving intensive induction regimens, which indicates an unmet clinical need to improve the initial treatment strategy in this disease. 16 Enrollment in a clinical trial testing regimens that include novel therapies would be the preferred choice for eligible patients.…”
Section: 89mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond R-CHOP, it predicts for a poor response to intensified induction regimens, salvage chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), and the novel histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat. 63,68,70,71 BCL2 and MYC protein expression in DE-DLBCL may be considered a functional readout of the cumulative genomic alterations that ultimately lead to their overexpression, mainly BCR and NF-kB signaling in the ABC patients and translocations in the GCB patients. These mechanisms may be clinically relevant, given that targeting BCR signaling and BCL2 may be an effective strategy in ABC-DE-DLBCL but not in GCB-DE-DLBCL or in patients with IG translocations.…”
Section: Biology Of Hgbl-dh and De-dlbclmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been recently reported that the adverse prognosis may be mitigated by other factors such as that lack of BCL-2 protein, and absence/low MYC protein expression 5 . The clinical significance of MYC-IHC and BCL-2-IHC expression has been extensively studied but the results have not been consistent; hence, a clinical utility of protein expression evaluation is still unclear [13][14] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%