2021
DOI: 10.1177/20552173211015503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relapse recovery in multiple sclerosis: Effect of treatment and contribution to long-term disability

Abstract: Background Although recovery from relapses in MS appears to contribute to disability, it has largely been ignored as a treatment endpoint and disability predictor. Objective To identify demographic and clinical predictors of relapse recovery in the first 3 years and examine its contribution to 10-year disability and MRI outcomes. Methods Relapse recovery was retrospectively assessed in 360 patients with MS using the return of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Functional System Scale and neurologic s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observational study has several important limitations. The average time from symptom onset to first visit at our centre was 8.4 years, and thus the baseline assessment for each patient was limited in terms of baseline examination and early attack history, despite being previously identified as important factors for long-term outcomes and may help further stratify patients with younger age at MS onset into higher to lower risk groups 7 9 10 39. Likewise, initial MRI was not available for every patient if scans occurred out-of-hospital.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observational study has several important limitations. The average time from symptom onset to first visit at our centre was 8.4 years, and thus the baseline assessment for each patient was limited in terms of baseline examination and early attack history, despite being previously identified as important factors for long-term outcomes and may help further stratify patients with younger age at MS onset into higher to lower risk groups 7 9 10 39. Likewise, initial MRI was not available for every patient if scans occurred out-of-hospital.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline assessment incorporated the EDSS, 6 individual FSS, T25FW 6 seconds, 36 presence of spinal cord or infratentorial lesions on initial MRI, 37 and baseline T2LV and BPF 10,12 . Early disease activity within 3 years of onset included annualized relapse rate (ARR); attack symptomatology of optic neuritis, motor, sensory, or brainstem/cerebellar; attacks treated with glucocorticoids; attacks while on DMT; poor attack recovery, defined as EDSS worsening of 1.0, confirmed 6 months after attack 38 ; and gadolinium‐enhancing or new or enlarging T2 brain or spinal cord lesions 7 . DMT information included time to first DMT, 39 number of DMTs, and presence of high‐efficacy DMTs, defined as fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, rituximab, or cyclophosphamide, within 3 years of onset 23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as the trajectory of recovery stays similar with subsequent demyelinating events pointing to individual specific factors responsible for a "good" vs "poor" recovery paradigm 4,8 . While younger age and lower severity of relapse are well established predictors of relapse remission, complete recovery may mask the accumulation of neuroaxonal damage below the clinical threshold creating the necessity for reliable biomarkers reflecting subclinical processes [8][9][10][11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cohort characteristicsMean retinal thinning from OCT baseline to OCT follow-up was 25.3µm (SD 22.7) in pRNFL and13.2µm (SD 7.9) in GCIPL, while from OCT acute to OCT follow-up it was 43.1µm (SD 45.2) in ∆pRNFL and 12.1µm (SD 8.2) in ∆GCIPL.Visual impairment at ON (visual FS) was weakly to moderately correlated with retinal thinning from OCT baseline to OCT follow-up in both pRNFL (Spearman rho = 0.219, p=0.046) and GCIPL (Spearman rho = 0.326, p=0.002), whereas from OCT acute to OCT follow-up only ∆GCIPL (Spearman rho = 0.302, p=0.008) but not ∆pRNFL (Spearman rho = 0.103, p=0.374) correlated with visual impairment. Similarly, complete ON recovery (visual FS post-relapse ≤ pre-relapse) was associated with lower pRNFL and GCIPL thinning from OCT baseline to OCT follow-up compared to incomplete ON recovery (∆pRNFL: 19.9µm [SD 24.3] vs. 31.1µm [SD 29.4], p=0.008; ∆GCIPL: 10.2µm [SD 10.8] vs. 16.5µm [SD 11.6], p<0.001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%