Relação Cirurgião-Dentista/Laboratório de Prótese Dentária: Quem Realiza o Planejamento das Armações Metálicas das Próteses Parciais Removíveis?

Ribeiro, Cyntia Ferreira; Melo, Allan Ulisses Carvalho de; Júnior, Antônio Alves; Oliveira, José Luiz Góes de; Araújo, Valdirene Paula de; Neves, Ana Christina Claro

doi:10.4034/rbcs.2012.16.04.05

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of the present study show the neglect of the DS in the planning and mouth preparation of the PRDP, corroborating with other studies carried out in São Paulo, Porto Alegre, Piauí, Bahia, Paraíba and Goiás [2,3,6,[10][11][12][13][14][15]. This research is the first to evaluate the quality of models and plans sent to the laboratories in Recife-PE.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…The numbers are also alarming with regard to the use of surveyors, since in none of the analyzed models were there information about the path of insertion and removal determined for the process of making the PRDP. Facts already reported since the 70's and still present stated that the design is often neglected by DS and delegated to the DT [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Leading to believe that there is still a lack of awareness on the part of DS and DT.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quality of models supplied to dental laboratories for the fabrication of partial removable denture framework

Menezes

Silva

Guerra

et al. 2020

RGO, Rev. Gaúch. Odontol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the models and plannings of metallic framework of removable partial prosthesis sent to dental laboratories in the city of Recife. Methods: The physical and technical conditions of plaster models were sent by the dentists to 4 dental laboratories. All models were examined, photographed and recorded on a form according to the research objective. Results: A total number of 235 models sent by dental surgeons were used to prepare the metallic structure, in which none of the models presented surveying nor the path of insertion. Out of the 235 models, 41 (17.44%) presented serious failures, such as positive and negative bubbles, broken dental elements, direct retainers and damaged edentulous areas. With respect to the planning, only 22 (9.35%) models were presented with the metallic framework planning, but in an unsatisfactory way. Regarding mouth preparation, no model presented a guide plane, and only 6.8% of models had rests seats, but incorrectly prepared. Conclusion: The models evaluated presented poor quality, lack of planning and no mouth preparation. This shows the need for dental surgeons to be aware of the appropriate prosthesis models and plannings in order to ensure a satisfactory and long-term rehabilitation of the patient, as well as preserving the remaining mouth structures.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%