Rejoinder to Open Access: The Whipping Boy for Problems in Scholarly Publishing

Crowston, Kevin

doi:10.17705/1cais.03716

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…it is hardly an area that has been bereft of any work (which we discuss throughout this paper). Moreover, despite the inherent jibe contained in Crowston's (2015) statement, our original paper did not set out to be a literature review of the scholarly communication discipline. Instead, it was to discuss how OA had become a whipping boy for problems experienced more widely in scholarly publishing.…”

Section: Emerging Themesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Access: The Whipping Boy for Problems in Scholarly Communication—A Response to the Rebuttals

Kingsley¹,

Kennan²

2015

CAIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we respond to five rebuttals to Kingsley and Kennan (2015). Four researchers in the information systems field and a university library director of research infrastructure provided these rebuttals. Almost without exception, the rebuttals from the information systems researchers take an analytical approach to the question of scholarly communication in their field. However, in undertaking their individual analyses of scholarly publishing or communication, they do not directly address the issues raised in our original debate piece. The rebuttal from the university library administrator (Groenewegen, 2015) alone directly addresses the discussion points raised in the original debate. As researchers in the field of scholarly communications, while this was not how we originally envisioned the debate, the rebuttals as a body of work have opened up some interesting themes, which we explore in addition to responding to the individual rebuttals.

show abstract

Section: Emerging Themesmentioning

confidence: 99%