2017
DOI: 10.4491/eer.2016.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rejection rate and mechanisms of drugs in drinking water by nanofiltration technology

Abstract: Nanofiltration (NF) technology is a membrane-based separation process, which has been pervasively used as the high-effective technology for drinking water treatment. In this study, a kind of composite polyamide NF thin film is selected to investigate the removal efficiencies and mechanisms of 14 trace drugs, which are commonly and frequently detected in the drinking water. The results show that the removal efficiencies of most drugs are quite high, indicating the NF is an effective technology to improve the qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Several research studies have examined the use of membrane technologies as effective processes to remove micropollutants from water. 6,7 Nanofiltration has become an interesting membrane separation process in a wide range of fields (pharmaceuticals, 8 food, 9 textile, 10 drinking water, 11 etc.) due to its low consumption of energy and low-cost maintenance in comparison with other separation processes such as distillation 12 or reverse osmosis 13 for both aqueous and organic streams.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Several research studies have examined the use of membrane technologies as effective processes to remove micropollutants from water. 6,7 Nanofiltration has become an interesting membrane separation process in a wide range of fields (pharmaceuticals, 8 food, 9 textile, 10 drinking water, 11 etc.) due to its low consumption of energy and low-cost maintenance in comparison with other separation processes such as distillation 12 or reverse osmosis 13 for both aqueous and organic streams.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At pH  5 the rejection of DBP decreases with the increase of the pH and at pH  7, the rejection is increased with increasing the pH value while, lower rejection has been recognized between pH 5-7 with insignificant effect of pH at this range [20]. Meanwhile, at pH  7 the rejections of APAP and BPA decrease with the increase of the pH and at pH  9, their rejections are increased with increasing the pH value while, lower rejection has been recognized between pH 7-9 with insignificant effect of pH at this range [21]. This may be linked to the dissociation equilibrium pKa values the understudied EDCs which 5 for DBP and 9 for APAP and BPA.…”
Section: The Effect Of Ph On the Edcs Removalmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Mechanisms of adsorption could include both hydrophobic interactions and the formation of hydrogen bonds between IBU and the membrane surface [36]. Previous studies have attributed IBU adsorption only to the membrane surface, neglecting to fully understand the behavior of IBU, hence, conceivably reporting inaccurate rejection values in flat-sheet studies [37][38][39][40]. At an initial racemic concentration of 1.08 mg/L, 83.7 µg/L IBU adsorbed onto the equipment and NF270 membrane.…”
Section: Effect Of Feed Concentration On Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%