1985
DOI: 10.1038/icb.1985.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rejection of Syngeneic Skin Grafts Following Retransplantation From Histo‐incompatible Rats

Abstract: Summary.Normal syngeneic recipients rejected a substantial proportion of skin grafts following their retransplantation after a period of residence on tolerant allogeneic or normal semi-allogeneic hosts. Rejection was often atypical in its delayed onset and protracted course. Examination of the effect of a variety of manipulations of graft donors and of intermediate hosts revealed that active involvement of cells derived from both categories was required for the initiation of an allograft reaction after transfe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In transplant models, using a mixture of syngeneic and allogeneic or xenogeneic islets (5,6) or with allophenic skin grafts (7,8), results supported the concept of selective killing of specific target cells. In contrast, other skin transplant models have shown significant bystander damage to adjacent syngeneic cells (9), and bystander injury occurred in mixed xenogeneic and syngeneic islets in primed recipients (10). Importantly, it is not yet clear how bystander damage is mediated in vivo and, conversely, what mechanisms restrain this form of collateral tissue injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In transplant models, using a mixture of syngeneic and allogeneic or xenogeneic islets (5,6) or with allophenic skin grafts (7,8), results supported the concept of selective killing of specific target cells. In contrast, other skin transplant models have shown significant bystander damage to adjacent syngeneic cells (9), and bystander injury occurred in mixed xenogeneic and syngeneic islets in primed recipients (10). Importantly, it is not yet clear how bystander damage is mediated in vivo and, conversely, what mechanisms restrain this form of collateral tissue injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%