2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rejection modeling of ceramic membranes in organic solvent nanofiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model has been used widely into recent times to model and explain nanofiltration performance using a variety of feed solutions with success [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]. DSPM-DE is a comprehensive model for nanofiltration.…”
Section: The Dspm-de Model Of Nanofiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model has been used widely into recent times to model and explain nanofiltration performance using a variety of feed solutions with success [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]. DSPM-DE is a comprehensive model for nanofiltration.…”
Section: The Dspm-de Model Of Nanofiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the image charges are screened by electric double layers in electrolyte solutions [21]. The DSPM-DE model in the form introduced by Bowen and Welfoot [21] has been used successfully by several authors, including in recent years for a variety of feed compositions [16] [18] [19]. In reference [21], Bowen and Welfoot successfully implemented the DSPM-DE model for the same membrane considered in the current work (Desal5DK) accounting for only the Born mechanism of dielectric exclusion for sodium-chloride and magnesium-chloride.…”
Section: Historical Development Of the Dspm-de Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tam & Tremblay (1991) described that with a five component mixture of PEGs, the MWCO of membranes can accurately be determined [37]. This method is widely used for the determination of the pore size distribution of membranes [26][27][28].…”
Section: Mwco Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For analysing the quality of ceramic UF or NF membranes, size exclusion and permporometry methods are most commonly used [26][27][28]. The disadvantage to permporometry is the requirement of specific equipment [28][29][30]. When using size exclusion methods, the molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) is determined using a multiple monodisperse molecules of different sizes, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, transport characteristics are much less investigated compared to polymeric membranes. Additionally, due to the multifaceted nature of interactions between membrane, solvent, and solute, the prediction of transport mechanism in OSN is much more complicated compared to aqueous applications [23]. Nevertheless, mathematical description of NF separations, whether it is organic or an aqueous solution containing organic compounds, is of great interest for many researchers [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and it is far from truly being predictive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%