2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-65867-0_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rejection Criteria Based on Outliers in the KiDS Photometric Redshifts and PDF Distributions Derived by Machine Learning

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This code has been used in some current sky surveys, e.g., KiDS (Cavuoti et al 2015) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; Brescia et al 2014). For our comparison, we adopt the MLPQNA photo-z catalog from Amaro et al (2021), where they have used the same data presented in §2.2 to train and test their networks.…”
Section: External Photo-z Catalog By Mlpqnamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This code has been used in some current sky surveys, e.g., KiDS (Cavuoti et al 2015) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; Brescia et al 2014). For our comparison, we adopt the MLPQNA photo-z catalog from Amaro et al (2021), where they have used the same data presented in §2.2 to train and test their networks.…”
Section: External Photo-z Catalog By Mlpqnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GaZNet-1 MLPQNA adopted for outliers in photo-z estimates (see details in e.g., Cavuoti et al 2012, Amaro et al 2021) and gives a measure of the fallibility of the method. In addition, the mean bias in this work is labeled as µ δz .…”
Section: Statistical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This definition is usually adopted for outliers in photometric redshifts determination (see detail in Amaro et al 2021). Finally, NMAD is defined as…”
Section: Testing the Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%