Abstract:This article addresses the commodification of housing in Havana from 2011 onwards. It argues that the theories of gentrification and rent-gap can illuminate aspects of the transformation of the Cuban capital, even though these theories originated in capitalist urban contexts and that in Cuba the state is responsible for determining the value and ownership of land. The analysis of digital real estate ads on four platforms between 2012 and 2020 allows us to estimate the price and location of properties sold, the… Show more
“…Gentrification in Havana, Cuba, was associated with Decree Law 288, the 2011 law that allowed Cuban citizens to buy and sell houses and own up to two houses. The case of gentrification in Havana, Cuba, comes in two forms (Jolivet and Alba-Carmichael, 2021) Gentrification in the Sovetsky neighborhood of Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, can be said to be a national-led strategy in a socio-political context (Valiyev and Wallwork, 2019). However, Baku's gentrification is not only explained as a result of the introduction of the market following the collapse of the Soviet Union, but it is also different from the slum district cleanup project in China.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous studies related to gentrification were conducted mainly in capitalist cities in the West. However, some studies deal with socialist systems or state-led gentrification, which shows that the power of capital is more influential than the political system or class structure (Valiyev and Wallwork, 2019;Jolivet andAlba-Carmichael, 2021, Tsang andHsu, 2022). Here, we probed the possibility of gentrification in the North Korean system by examining the cases of the socialist system and state-led gen-trification and looking at urban development and urban space restructuring in North Korea.…”
Background and objective: Gentrification generally refers to changes in residents or operators in neighborhoods by investment in capital, a phenomenon in which wealthy or young professionals replace existing residents or operators in socioeconomic terms. Although conducted mainly in capitalist cities, some studies dealt with socialist systems or state-led gentrification. We intended to demonstrate the gentrification in North Korean by examining the cases of the socialist system and state-led gentrification and looking at urban development and urban space restructuring in Pyongyang Metropolitan Area in North Korea.Methods: To build up methodological framework of the study, we reviewed previous literature that deals with gentrification in capitalist cities, socialist systems, and state-led planning. About the gentrification phenomenon in North Korea, we examined secondary data of North Korea refugee interviews with North Korea government documents and research papers about Pyongyang's building and real estate development. Then, we compared gentrification in capitalist cities, socialist systems (or state-led planning), and North Korea.Results: Gentrification in capitalist cities, socialist system and North Korea differs in their enabling conditions, gentrifying agents, gentrifiers, and processes. National and local governments, usually with the North Korea communist party, play a leading role as gentrifying agents through their public policy. In the gentrification processes, there is an increasing gap between rich and poor and spatial separation between them, especially when displaced households being pushed out of town in North Korea.Conclusion: Urban development and apartment construction in Pyongyang shows the possibility of developing into existing gentrification, and if the private sector that leads gentrification occurs and at the same time, spatial replacement by privileged or upper classes appears, it will be clear that it is a kind of gentrification under the command economy.
“…Gentrification in Havana, Cuba, was associated with Decree Law 288, the 2011 law that allowed Cuban citizens to buy and sell houses and own up to two houses. The case of gentrification in Havana, Cuba, comes in two forms (Jolivet and Alba-Carmichael, 2021) Gentrification in the Sovetsky neighborhood of Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, can be said to be a national-led strategy in a socio-political context (Valiyev and Wallwork, 2019). However, Baku's gentrification is not only explained as a result of the introduction of the market following the collapse of the Soviet Union, but it is also different from the slum district cleanup project in China.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous studies related to gentrification were conducted mainly in capitalist cities in the West. However, some studies deal with socialist systems or state-led gentrification, which shows that the power of capital is more influential than the political system or class structure (Valiyev and Wallwork, 2019;Jolivet andAlba-Carmichael, 2021, Tsang andHsu, 2022). Here, we probed the possibility of gentrification in the North Korean system by examining the cases of the socialist system and state-led gen-trification and looking at urban development and urban space restructuring in North Korea.…”
Background and objective: Gentrification generally refers to changes in residents or operators in neighborhoods by investment in capital, a phenomenon in which wealthy or young professionals replace existing residents or operators in socioeconomic terms. Although conducted mainly in capitalist cities, some studies dealt with socialist systems or state-led gentrification. We intended to demonstrate the gentrification in North Korean by examining the cases of the socialist system and state-led gentrification and looking at urban development and urban space restructuring in Pyongyang Metropolitan Area in North Korea.Methods: To build up methodological framework of the study, we reviewed previous literature that deals with gentrification in capitalist cities, socialist systems, and state-led planning. About the gentrification phenomenon in North Korea, we examined secondary data of North Korea refugee interviews with North Korea government documents and research papers about Pyongyang's building and real estate development. Then, we compared gentrification in capitalist cities, socialist systems (or state-led planning), and North Korea.Results: Gentrification in capitalist cities, socialist system and North Korea differs in their enabling conditions, gentrifying agents, gentrifiers, and processes. National and local governments, usually with the North Korea communist party, play a leading role as gentrifying agents through their public policy. In the gentrification processes, there is an increasing gap between rich and poor and spatial separation between them, especially when displaced households being pushed out of town in North Korea.Conclusion: Urban development and apartment construction in Pyongyang shows the possibility of developing into existing gentrification, and if the private sector that leads gentrification occurs and at the same time, spatial replacement by privileged or upper classes appears, it will be clear that it is a kind of gentrification under the command economy.
“…Indeed, with the latter group acquiring real estate in central neighbourhoods like Old Havana and El Vedado, many Havana properties were converted into private businesses catering to international tourists and travel (Jolivet and Alba-Carmichael, 2021). As a result, the pre-pandemic boom not only contributed to an acceleration of local house prices and gentrification effects (Baldoquin et al, 2020), it also boosted the growth of self-employment in Havana’s emerging private sector (Simoni, 2018).…”
“…However, the fact that a ‘mature’ market characterised by steady investments, stable prices and local demand did not materialise, was not due to exogenous shocks only. In hindsight, the legalisation of property sales at market prices was a crucial step towards the re-commodification of Havana’s housing stock (Jolivet and Alba-Carmichael, 2021). Yet with Cuban nationals only being allowed to invest in one residential property and one vacation home (Miglioli, 2021), asset-based housing accumulation remained a controlled process.…”
Section: Havana’s Limits To Urban Commodificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidently, monetary inflation also affects reinvestment in housing. Although some Cuban nationals saw a chance to buy property as a hedge against inflation (Jolivet and Alba-Carmichael, 2021: 270), Day Zero generally undermined the property market as Cuban nationals need spare cash and hard currency to buy essential goods and scarce products (Fieser, 2021). As one interviewee commented: I own four short-term rentals and one paladar [a private restaurant] in Havana, but right now the market is completely down.…”
Section: Havana’s Limits To Urban Commodificationmentioning
In the Global South, cities are increasingly restructuring themselves around the financial pressures of international capital markets. Therefore, it is sometimes hypothesised that financial innovations created in the Global North are moving ‘South’. However, even though transnational capital is finding its way into Southern regions and other areas of reform, the road towards urban commodification is bumpy and uneven. In Havana, Cuba, the government recently legalised free market home sales, contributing to an unprecedented transnational property boom where many homes were acquired by Cuban émigrés and nationals and converted into restaurants, hotels or short-term rentals. Nevertheless, due to endogenous and exogenous market restraints, the pandemic and complex interactions between state authorities and property-owning private entrepreneurs, Cuban-style commodification remains an incomplete and contested process. Even so, non-debt bearing assetisation pressures are clearly redefining Havana’s socialist property market. While the state encourages foreign direct investment into state-owned hotels and joint ventures, transnational remittances contribute to the commodification of Havana’s private housing stock.
This article addresses the two processes of market making and transnationalization in Havana through the lens of gentrification theory. Using a case study situated between Global South and East, this article looks more closely at transnational families and migrants as agents of gentrification in Havana, analysing how they create and exploit the rent‐gap. Returning to the central ideas of ‘highest and best use’ and ‘circulations’ in N. Smith's rent‐gap theory, I analyse how increased transnational mobility has affected the commodification and potential use of housing in Havana. Based on interviews with transnational owners who purchased housing to upgrade and convert into an Airbnb, this article shows how the “highest and best use” of a property is evaluated from elsewhere. It also demonstrates the complexities of transnational gentrification in a southern socialist city and insists on the need to understand more broadly the gentrification–migration nexus.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.