2007
DOI: 10.1353/jge.2007.0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinventing the Core: Community, Dialogue, and Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paradigm, departments are recognized as socially constructed organizations enmeshed in larger institutional, educational, professional, and social cultures. When faculty members come together to discuss matters of curriculum evaluation and renewal, they bring with them a set of values, ideologies, and assumptions based on their contextualized experiences (Pittendrigh, 2007).…”
Section: Dialogic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paradigm, departments are recognized as socially constructed organizations enmeshed in larger institutional, educational, professional, and social cultures. When faculty members come together to discuss matters of curriculum evaluation and renewal, they bring with them a set of values, ideologies, and assumptions based on their contextualized experiences (Pittendrigh, 2007).…”
Section: Dialogic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interdisciplinary courses that expose students to cross-functional material have been shown to improve critical thinking skills (Braun, 2004). Development of a first-year seminar in the general education curriculum has also met with success (Pittendrigh, 2007). Other techniques used to promote curriculum integration include writing across the curriculum, critical thinking, and increased computer usage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some projects have explored the underpinnings of dialogic processes in different settings within universities (Pittendrigh 2007) and in collaboration with neighbourhoods (Miller and Hafner 2008). Other studies have focused on analysing the cooperation between policy makers and communities (Anyon 2008) and on how policy making has been formulated, drawing on empirical evidence (Honig and Coburn 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%