John Dewey and the Notion of Trans-Action 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26380-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinventing Social Relations and Processes: John Dewey and Trans-Actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there is no previous, objective, and stable existence of any decision (or whatever element) that lasts outside the relational situation (Lorino, 2018). The relation is the given phenomenon, it is the raw material (Morgner, 2020), and therefore, the unit of analysis starts from the relations, and "the making of a decision" consists in the transformation of this relationship.…”
Section: Performativity Decision-inthe-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, there is no previous, objective, and stable existence of any decision (or whatever element) that lasts outside the relational situation (Lorino, 2018). The relation is the given phenomenon, it is the raw material (Morgner, 2020), and therefore, the unit of analysis starts from the relations, and "the making of a decision" consists in the transformation of this relationship.…”
Section: Performativity Decision-inthe-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We kept Dewey and Bentley's trans-action label but considering its further development in Processual-Relational Sociology(Dépelteau, 2018d, Lorino, 2020, Morgner, 2020.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach discussed in the article draws on recent theorizing in relational sociology (Dépelteau, , 2015(Dépelteau, , 2018a(Dépelteau, , 2018bDépelteau and Powell, 2013;Morgner, 2020;Powell and Dépelteau, 2013) to consider the potential of a theoretical prospectus which sees no necessary antinomy between 'micro' and 'macro' accounts of music's place in social life, but instead adopts a 'flat' social ontology and a process-relational, transactional 2 approach to what has heretofore largely been theorized as the 'interaction' of music and listeners. In what may strike some readers as a somewhat paradoxical move, rather than seeing the work of so-called 'micro'-sociologists of music as excessively focused on instances of aesthetic experience, I suggest that if we are to gain a better understanding of music's variable functioning within social life, these accounts do not, in fact, go far enough in either empirical or theoretic terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%