1998
DOI: 10.1177/0734371x9801800404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinventing Government, The New Public Management and Civil Service Systems in International Perspective

Abstract: Reinventing government is a cross-national movement that has important, and potentially negative, implications for the career civil service. This article examines the global development of the reinventing government movement, arguing that it represents at least in part an attack on bureaucratic power and the career public service Each of its principal themes—including debureaucratization, decentralization, privatization, and managerialism —poses challenges to important public service values We argue that reinv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These newly structured public-sector agencies often adopt new HR strategies (such as the development of commercial skills and competencies and downsizing) to respond to the need to become more performance-oriented and the need for accountability (Farnham & Horton, 1996). The overall effect of NPM is that HRM is experiencing a near-revolution in its operating practices (Hays & Kearney, 2001).This impact of NPM on HRM has been found in countries around the world, including New Zealand (e.g., Powell & Spicer, 1994), the United Kingdom (e.g., Colling & Ferner, 1992;Farnham & Horton, 1996), and the United States (e.g., Kearney & Hays, 1998;Osborne & Gaebler, 1992). The impact of these reforms on HRM has occurred despite the varying degrees and emphases of NPM that have been implemented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These newly structured public-sector agencies often adopt new HR strategies (such as the development of commercial skills and competencies and downsizing) to respond to the need to become more performance-oriented and the need for accountability (Farnham & Horton, 1996). The overall effect of NPM is that HRM is experiencing a near-revolution in its operating practices (Hays & Kearney, 2001).This impact of NPM on HRM has been found in countries around the world, including New Zealand (e.g., Powell & Spicer, 1994), the United Kingdom (e.g., Colling & Ferner, 1992;Farnham & Horton, 1996), and the United States (e.g., Kearney & Hays, 1998;Osborne & Gaebler, 1992). The impact of these reforms on HRM has occurred despite the varying degrees and emphases of NPM that have been implemented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The commercialization of the public sector is characterized by the adoption of private-sector managerial practices, often called new public management (NPM; Kearney & Hays, 1998;McLaughlin, Osborne, & Ferlie, 2002). The emphasis now is on achieving efficiency, effectiveness, and economy in the activities performed by public-sector agencies, and on the ability to compete with private-sector organizations that operate in similar markets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wake of widespread disillusionment in the power of government to address problems of central importance to modern society (Pharr, Putnam, and Dalton 2000), as well as sustained attacks on the efficiency and effectiveness of government from the neo-liberal perspective, trust in government has generally been declining over the past decades. Even the NPM literature, which recommends greater empowerment for government employees in order to enhance performance, has as one of its foundations a deep distrust of the intentions of public servants (Kearney and Hays 1998). These trends are highly relevant to studies of identification in the public sector.…”
Section: Identification As Change-orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of these reform efforts has led some scholars to characterize them as identity projects for the public sector (Du Gay 1996). And while these movements have been criticized (Kearney and Hays 1998), as well as spawned counter reform movements, such as the New Public Service (Denhardt and Denhardt 2000;, nevertheless, the drive for organizational reform has left an indelible mark upon the public administration systems of both developed and developing countries (Pollitt and Bouckaert 2011;McCourt 2008). Moreover, the performance imperative continues to dominate scholarly and political discourse about the public sector.…”
Section: Background and Motivation Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their use by governments across the OECD during the 1980s and 1990s reflected an attempt to achieve greater effectiveness and efficiency in the use of public funds, referred to by Kearney and Hays (1998) as New Public Management.…”
Section: Asset-based Approach To Nrmmentioning
confidence: 99%