DOI: 10.31390/gradschool_theses.5022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinterpreting the Tectonic Model of the Southern Part of the Taconic Orogeny through a Provenance Study of Late Ordovician Sandstones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grain size and sampling biases are of great concern for detrital zircon record interpretations [35]. Analyzing two different sandstone samples from the Horseleg Mountain location yielded no major differences in age distribution (see Table 2 in [13]). No grain size analyses were performed.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grain size and sampling biases are of great concern for detrital zircon record interpretations [35]. Analyzing two different sandstone samples from the Horseleg Mountain location yielded no major differences in age distribution (see Table 2 in [13]). No grain size analyses were performed.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All ages reported herein are less than 20% discordant. Zircon age data for the Alexander Gap, Dirtseller Mountain, and Hanging Rock locations were taken from [13], and analytical details for those analyses can be obtained from there.…”
Section: Apatite Phenocryst "Fingerprinting" Using Laser Ablation Ind...mentioning
confidence: 99%