2022
DOI: 10.1017/rdc.2022.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinterpretation of Fluvial-Aeolian Sediments From Last Glacial Termination Classic Type Localities Using High-Resolution Radiocarbon Data From the Polish Part of the European Sand Belt

Abstract: This paper presents 66 radiocarbon (14C) dates obtained at 33 key sites from the Polish part of the European Sand Belt. These calibrated dating results were compared to 34 high-resolution 14C dates obtained from a fluvial-aeolian sediments to identify pedogenic phases from the late Pleniglacial interval to the early Holocene. These identified pedogenic phases were correlated with Greenland ice-core records, revealing high sensitivity of the fluvio-aeolian paleoenvironment to climate changes. Two pedogenic phas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(83 reference statements)
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…indicates a termination of CS deposition during the Late Pleniglacial or in the beginning of the Earliest Dryas of the Weichselian Late Glacial (Figure 8), corresponding to the Older Coversand II (OC II), 63 that is, the GS-2.1a event (NGRIP). 64 The youngest of the determined dates (13.1 ± 0.5 ka; 64 interstadial warmings (Bölling, Alleröd) as noted by Kasse, 8 Kasse et al, 10 Van Huissteden et al, 58 Vandenberghe et al, 63 Koster 65 and Kaiser et al 66 and in Poland and Ukraine by Zieli nski, 14 Moska et al, 66,67 Sokołowski et al 68 and Moska et al 69 ; (ii) dated sample collection from deposits subject to pedogenic processes, potentially leading to age rejuvenation; and (iii) the occurrence of distinctly olderaged (15.7 ± 0.5 ka) deposits in an almost-identical stratigraphic position (Figures 1c and 2b; Table 2).…”
Section: Unit B2mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…indicates a termination of CS deposition during the Late Pleniglacial or in the beginning of the Earliest Dryas of the Weichselian Late Glacial (Figure 8), corresponding to the Older Coversand II (OC II), 63 that is, the GS-2.1a event (NGRIP). 64 The youngest of the determined dates (13.1 ± 0.5 ka; 64 interstadial warmings (Bölling, Alleröd) as noted by Kasse, 8 Kasse et al, 10 Van Huissteden et al, 58 Vandenberghe et al, 63 Koster 65 and Kaiser et al 66 and in Poland and Ukraine by Zieli nski, 14 Moska et al, 66,67 Sokołowski et al 68 and Moska et al 69 ; (ii) dated sample collection from deposits subject to pedogenic processes, potentially leading to age rejuvenation; and (iii) the occurrence of distinctly olderaged (15.7 ± 0.5 ka) deposits in an almost-identical stratigraphic position (Figures 1c and 2b; Table 2).…”
Section: Unit B2mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A comparison of results obtained from aeolian deposits derived from the ESB's central part with the other study sites is very difficult. The complication is that research on the lithology and age of aeolian successions was focused almost exclusively on fluvio‐aeolian or dune sediments 11,13–15,67–69,114 . However, the CS as a separate unit of aeolian sediments is well recognized in northwestern Europe 7,8,12 and in Poland 14,71 .…”
Section: Sedimentary Succession As Paleoenvironmental Change − Discus...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In sites 5, 6, 7 and 8 multistory sequences (Holliday et al, 2017) of several younger (Modern period) incipient buried Arenosols occur in the interval above the Podzol. In the remaining sites, either one Arenosol (site 4) or a multistory sequence of two or more Arenosols (sites 3, 9 and 10) of Late Glacial -early Holocene age (Ninard et al, 2022(Ninard et al, , 2023Sokołowski et al, 2022) occur in the dune deposits overlain by the buried Podzol (Figure 4). At sites 3, 9 and 10, the buried Podzol and Late Glacial -early Holocene paleosols are separated by a sediment interval merely 1 m thick or less (Figures 3 and 4).…”
Section: General Characteristics Of Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%