2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinstating location improves mnemonic access but not fidelity of visual mental representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, IVR can be used to investigate the relative contributions and interactions of different features (e.g., temporal, contextual, semantic, and auditory information) in the processing and representation of visual information. For example, Martarelli et al (2022) adopted an IVR approach combined with continuous measures to investigate the impact of object position location on the precision of subsequent color recall in IVR. They found that congruent location at recall (corresponding to the location where the object was previously encoded) enhanced color access, thus suggesting that spatial information embedded in natural behavior acts like a scaffolding structure that facilitates visual memory.…”
Section: Investigating Visual Memory With Ivrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, IVR can be used to investigate the relative contributions and interactions of different features (e.g., temporal, contextual, semantic, and auditory information) in the processing and representation of visual information. For example, Martarelli et al (2022) adopted an IVR approach combined with continuous measures to investigate the impact of object position location on the precision of subsequent color recall in IVR. They found that congruent location at recall (corresponding to the location where the object was previously encoded) enhanced color access, thus suggesting that spatial information embedded in natural behavior acts like a scaffolding structure that facilitates visual memory.…”
Section: Investigating Visual Memory With Ivrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space serves as a scaffold for working memory retention [18][19][20][21], as well as for the selection and prioritisation of specific objects within working memory [21][22][23][24]. One particular and recent demonstration of this involves spatial biases in gaze when selectively attending to objects in visual working memory [24][25][26][27] in the absence of anything to look at (see also [28][29][30][31]).…”
Section: Space-based Mnemonic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space serves as a scaffold for working memory retention ( de Vries & van Ede, 2023 ; Heuer & Rolfs, 2021a ; Jiang, Olson, & Chun, 2000 ; Pertzov & Husain, 2014 ; Schneegans & Bays, 2017 ), as well as for the selection and prioritization of specific objects within working memory ( Griffin & Nobre, 2003 ; Heuer & Rolfs, 2021a ; Kuo, Rao, Lepsien, & Nobre, 2009 ; van Ede, Chekroud, & Nobre, 2019 ). One particular and recent demonstration of this involves spatial biases in gaze when selectively attending to objects in visual working memory ( de Vries, Fejer, & van Ede, 2023 ; Draschkow, Kallmayer, & Nobre, 2022 ; van Ede, Board, & Nobre, 2020 ; van Ede, Chekroud, & Nobre, 2019 ; van Ede, Deden, & Nobre, 2021 ) in the absence of anything to look at (see also Ferreira, Apel, & Henderson, 2008 ; Martarelli, Ovalle Fresa, Popic, Globig, & Rothen, 2022 ; Spivey & Geng, 2001 ; Wynn, Shen, & Ryan, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%