2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0160-2527(01)00079-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcing stereotypes: How the focus on forensic cases in news reporting may influence public attitudes towards the mentally ill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
88
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last 20 years, there has been an increasing interest in the role of printed media in conveying negative attitudes towards people with mental illness [13,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Although qualitative studies dealing with the stigma of mental illness in printed media have mainly used content analysis or discourse analysis [26], there is no standardised measurement of the stigma of mental illness in printed media, particularly for use in international studies using clearly operationalised definitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 20 years, there has been an increasing interest in the role of printed media in conveying negative attitudes towards people with mental illness [13,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Although qualitative studies dealing with the stigma of mental illness in printed media have mainly used content analysis or discourse analysis [26], there is no standardised measurement of the stigma of mental illness in printed media, particularly for use in international studies using clearly operationalised definitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also evident that our findings aligned with the observation from Hanson et al's [36] research, in how the printed press deployed startling statistics, such as "700,000 sufferers" or "1000 a year have to give up work" [36], to associate RA with a societal 'burden' or 'cost'. Research has analysed the media's usage of language in the context of people with mental health problems [17,[19][20][21][22][23], epilepsy [9,10], diabetes [11], oral cancer [14], and the rheumatological conditions of gout [15] and osteoarthritis [35]. However, our study was the first published one on how the popular press has represented through language those who live with RA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis [21] of newspaper clippings found that almost half of British tabloid articles applied derogatory terms, such as 'nutter' and 'looney' when writing about people with mental health problems. There also has been an overwhelming media fixation on the language of violence in the depiction of schizophrenia, often playing on stereotypes of 'dangerousness' and 'criminality' [22,23]. The 'helpless' or 'incompetent' victim are other demeaning terms written by journalists to characterise people with mental health conditions [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative representation of the mentally ill is not exclusive to post-Soviet Russian media. Studies from other countries have also noted that the trend in journalism is to focus on threats related to mental illness, creating negative images of mentally ill people (angermeyer & Schulze 2001;granellO & Pauley 2000;link & cullen 1986;Sieff 2003). Therefore in our study we decided not to analyse such representations in detail, but rather to focus on how the new mental health policy ideas were reflected in newspaper coverage.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%