1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02595465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcement shape effects on the fracture behavior and ductility of particulate-reinforced 6061-Al matrix composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not shown, it also predicts that the maximum triaxial stress occurs between particles in the loading direction. These results correspond very well with predictions for composites having spherical particles by Song et al [34], who used a unit cell finite element models are necessary to understand the material response and improve it. Finite element models of particle-reinforced aluminum in 2D and 3D have been constructed and have lead us to the followi11g conclusIOns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although not shown, it also predicts that the maximum triaxial stress occurs between particles in the loading direction. These results correspond very well with predictions for composites having spherical particles by Song et al [34], who used a unit cell finite element models are necessary to understand the material response and improve it. Finite element models of particle-reinforced aluminum in 2D and 3D have been constructed and have lead us to the followi11g conclusIOns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The effect of reinforcement shape on its propensity to fracture has also been investigated but findings reported in the literature are not consistent. Li et al [8] and Vedani et al [32] report small differences in the rate of damage accumulation depending on particle shape, while other studies point to a distinct link between the fracture of a reinforcement and its shape and/or aspect ratio: the higher the angularity and/or the aspect ratio of the reinforcement the more prone it is to cracking [2,3,[36][37][38][39]. Conversely, there is evidence that microstructural damage changes from reinforcement fracture to matrix voiding at or near the matrixreinforcement interface as the reinforcement size, volume fraction, angularity or aspect ratio decrease [10,19,34,36,40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies have determined that the predominant damage micromechanisms leading to this degradation are: (i) reinforcement fracture, (ii) void nucleation and growth in the matrix and (iii) debonding along the matrix/reinforcement interface [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. With respect to the influence of basic microstructural parameters on the rate of damage accumulation, it has been shown that increasing reinforcement size, angularity, aspect ratio, volume fraction, inhomogeneity in spatial distribution, interface degradation and matrix strength increases the level of damage in particle reinforced MMCs [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%