2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/6391572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcement of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube in Nitrile Rubber: In Comparison with Carbon Black, Conductive Carbon Black, and Precipitated Silica

Abstract: The properties of nitrile rubber (NBR) reinforced by multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT), conductive carbon black (CCB), carbon black (CB), and precipitated silica (PSi) were investigated via viscoelastic behavior, bound rubber content, electrical properties, cross-link density, and mechanical properties. The filler content was varied from 0 to 15 phr. MWCNT shows the greatest magnitude of reinforcement considered in terms of tensile strength, modulus, hardness, and abrasion resistance followed by CCB, CB, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crosslink density value improved gradually from 4.2 mol/cm 3 for neat NBR up to 5.1, 5.6, and 6.6 mol/cm 3 for 5, 10, and 15 phr of CNF, respectively. This is in agreement with the results presented in other works on reinforcing nanofillers, such as carbon black, carbon nanotubes, or nanofibers in nitrile rubber composites [25,26,31,32]. At the same CNF loading (10 phr), the vulcanizates filled with silanized CNF showed considerably higher values for crosslink density compared to vulcanizate filled with untreated CNF, since the presence of silanes promoted CNF-rubber bonding and improved the dispersion of the CNF in nitrile rubber matrix.…”
Section: Crosslink Density Measurementsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The crosslink density value improved gradually from 4.2 mol/cm 3 for neat NBR up to 5.1, 5.6, and 6.6 mol/cm 3 for 5, 10, and 15 phr of CNF, respectively. This is in agreement with the results presented in other works on reinforcing nanofillers, such as carbon black, carbon nanotubes, or nanofibers in nitrile rubber composites [25,26,31,32]. At the same CNF loading (10 phr), the vulcanizates filled with silanized CNF showed considerably higher values for crosslink density compared to vulcanizate filled with untreated CNF, since the presence of silanes promoted CNF-rubber bonding and improved the dispersion of the CNF in nitrile rubber matrix.…”
Section: Crosslink Density Measurementsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These high performance rubbers exhibit excellent abrasion/ adhesion resistance and superior mechanical properties for their wide range of applications. NBR is not crystallizable under high strain, and therefore the reinforcing fillers are generally incorporated to yield sufficiently high mechanical properties [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 ]. Chougule and Giese [ 93 ] reported significant mechanical reinforcing effects of CNT as compared with CB in NBR due to good dispersion and effective interaction.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Rubber Nanocomposites Of Carbon mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower volume fraction of MWCNTs produced a significant increase in tensile strength and energy at break when compared with carbon black due to high degree of dispersion. In another work, the mechanical properties of nitrile rubber reinforced with 0 to 15 phr of MWCNT, conductive (CB, CB), and precipitated silica prepared by the two roll mill method and corresponding data are recorded in Table 8 [ 97 ]. It is clearly seen that tensile strength, modulus (100%), and hardness enhanced with the increasing of the loading of filler.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Rubber Nanocomposites Of Carbon mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak to peak current and voltage increased linearly for both parts with increasing frequency. However, the rate of this increase is lower for the peak to peak current of the back part which is promoted due to the higher resistivity of NBR compared to human skin [78,79]. The output performance of the TESTEC was also tested for variable air gap between the operating surfaces.…”
Section: Triboelectricity Based Stepping and Tapping Energy Case (Tesmentioning
confidence: 99%