2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1810.07207
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcement Learning Decoders for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation

Ryan Sweke,
Markus S. Kesselring,
Evert P. L. van Nieuwenburg
et al.

Abstract: Topological error correcting codes, and particularly the surface code, currently provide the most feasible roadmap towards large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computation. As such, obtaining fast and flexible decoding algorithms for these codes, within the experimentally relevant context of faulty syndrome measurements, is of critical importance. In this work, we show that the problem of decoding such codes, in the full fault-tolerant setting, can be naturally reformulated as a process of repeated interactions … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other than this, look-up table [27] and machine learning (ML) based decoders have been proposed for surface codes as well [28][29][30]. However, for this study, we stick with the MWPM decoder.…”
Section: Surface Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than this, look-up table [27] and machine learning (ML) based decoders have been proposed for surface codes as well [28][29][30]. However, for this study, we stick with the MWPM decoder.…”
Section: Surface Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular decoding algorithm is Blossom Decoder [18] which uses the Minimum Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM) algorithm, where the decoding time increases as O(N 4 ) where N is the number of qubits. Recently machine learning (ML) is being used for decoding purposes [19,20,21,22] where, once the system is trained, the decoding technically runs as O(1). Moreover, MWPM works satisfactorily when the error probability of the system is low, as it always tries to find the minimum number of errors that can lead to the syndrome (discussed in detail in the Section II) at hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, RL has been successfully applied to challenging problems in quantum physics including quantum state preparation [39,40], quantum optimal control [41,42], and quantum error correction [43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%