2022
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2021.3062500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcement Learning and Particle Swarm Optimization Supporting Real-Time Rescue Assignments for Multiple Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application Scenario Method Limitations -Open Issues [Zeng et al, 2023] Maritime Transportation Ensemble Learning Decentralized operation and scalability [Wu et al, 2022a] Maritime Transportation Data Analysis and Risk Modelling Low automation level for collision avoidance [Hesselbarth et al, 2020] Maritime Transportation Kinematic Technique using PNT Data Low level of data analysis and ML integration [Han and Yang, 2021] Security and Privacy Part-FL Additional sets of data Security and Privacy CNN and Multi-Layer Perception Realistic channel modelling [Ma et al, 2022] Security and Privacy Credibility Mechanisms Extension to more complex orientations [Qin et al, 2022] Security and Privacy Blockchain Technology Extension to more complex orientations [Zhang et al, 2022b] Fault Detection Adaptive FL Convergence improvement [Shuangzhong and Fault Detection Interpretable FL Network in a multi-level federated center [Zhao et al, 2022] Underwater Applications Interpretable FL Limited number of nodes Underwater Applications Pac-Man inspired CPP for AUVs Low ML integration and connectivity [Wu et al, 2022b] Underwater Applications RL & Particle Swarm Optimization Low decentralization [Lin et al, 2022] Underwater Applications Multi-agent RL Low decentralization (MLP) is used, where the CNN part was responsible for the feature extraction of the data and MLP performed the attack classification. Moreover, the authors also deal with the straggler problem that might appear in FL scenarios, and refered to the inability of the involved devices to timely upload their data.…”
Section: Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Application Scenario Method Limitations -Open Issues [Zeng et al, 2023] Maritime Transportation Ensemble Learning Decentralized operation and scalability [Wu et al, 2022a] Maritime Transportation Data Analysis and Risk Modelling Low automation level for collision avoidance [Hesselbarth et al, 2020] Maritime Transportation Kinematic Technique using PNT Data Low level of data analysis and ML integration [Han and Yang, 2021] Security and Privacy Part-FL Additional sets of data Security and Privacy CNN and Multi-Layer Perception Realistic channel modelling [Ma et al, 2022] Security and Privacy Credibility Mechanisms Extension to more complex orientations [Qin et al, 2022] Security and Privacy Blockchain Technology Extension to more complex orientations [Zhang et al, 2022b] Fault Detection Adaptive FL Convergence improvement [Shuangzhong and Fault Detection Interpretable FL Network in a multi-level federated center [Zhao et al, 2022] Underwater Applications Interpretable FL Limited number of nodes Underwater Applications Pac-Man inspired CPP for AUVs Low ML integration and connectivity [Wu et al, 2022b] Underwater Applications RL & Particle Swarm Optimization Low decentralization [Lin et al, 2022] Underwater Applications Multi-agent RL Low decentralization (MLP) is used, where the CNN part was responsible for the feature extraction of the data and MLP performed the attack classification. Moreover, the authors also deal with the straggler problem that might appear in FL scenarios, and refered to the inability of the involved devices to timely upload their data.…”
Section: Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations indicate low complexity in coverage path generation and obstacle avoidance over conventional techniques. Regarding reinforcement learning (RL) integration in underwater applications, the papers in [Wu et al, 2022b], [Lin et al, 2022] proposed relevant techniques for scenarios where AUV swarms perform rescue operations and underwater diffusion pollution tracking. These solutions provide improved convergence and performance, in terms of delay and errors, surpassing other conventional optimization and ML approaches.…”
Section: Underwater Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, UGVs can navigate through debris, confined spaces, and rough terrain, facilitating victim detection and information gathering. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or drones have emerged as valuable tools for search and rescue operations [3]. Their ability to cover large areas and access hard-toreach locations quickly makes them particularly useful for locating missing persons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neural network is demanding on the choice of data inputs while the UV cannot provide when encountering fault cases, which shares the same concern with the greedy algorithm, as the greedy algorithm needs to decompose the data for processing [28][29][30]. Hence the swarm intelligence algorithm for optimization stands out to be a preferable method to tackle the FTC application of UVs due to its flexibility of data inputs and fast convergence speed [31][32][33]. Zhu's group has applied Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) based FTC on the unmanned underwater vehicle, though satisfactory torque outputs are achieved, the traditional PSO method shows poor real-time feedback, which does not conform to the online requirement of UV FTCs [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%