2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcement and mud-pumping benefits of geosynthetics in railway tracks: Model tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of the back-saturated specimen prior to applying the cyclic loading (see Table 2). The above observations are further supported by large-scale testing conducted by Chawla and Shahu (2016), where mud pumping under railway loading was simulated using physical modelling of a track element, and a substantial increase in the water content was measured just beneath the sleeper after instability.…”
Section: Fluidization Of Subgrade Soil Due To Cyclic Loadmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…of the back-saturated specimen prior to applying the cyclic loading (see Table 2). The above observations are further supported by large-scale testing conducted by Chawla and Shahu (2016), where mud pumping under railway loading was simulated using physical modelling of a track element, and a substantial increase in the water content was measured just beneath the sleeper after instability.…”
Section: Fluidization Of Subgrade Soil Due To Cyclic Loadmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Data presented in Fig. 3 shows that mud pumping incidents are identified mostly for fine grained soils having a low to moderate plasticity index (i.e., PI < 26) (Ayres 1986;Raymond 1986;Alobaidi and Hoare 1996;Muramoto et al 2006;Liu et al 2013;Duong et al 2014;Chawla and Shahu 2016).…”
Section: Experimental Investigation 21 Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relatively old existing rail infrastructure, together with the continuous increase in freight tonnage, have triggered various geotechnical problems in existing railroads involving both, subgrade and embankment. Geotechnical problems associated with railroads are related (but not limited) to (a) mud pumping (eg,); (b) subgrade subsidence (eg,); (c) progressive shear failure (eg,); (d) ballast pocket (eg,); (e) massive shear failure (eg,); (f) subgrade cavities and collapse (eg,); (g) shrink‐swell soils (eg,); and (h) frozen soils (eg,). Railroads issues associated with shrink/swell soils are discussed in detail in Sanchez et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%