2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00131-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reimbursement policies, incentives and disincentives to perform laparoscopic surgery in Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, laparoscopic procedures are often more time-consuming than traditional procedures, at least during the 'learning curve', and they are also usually more expensive compared to open procedures, mainly due to higher operating room costs for laparoscopic surgeries. [ 33 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, laparoscopic procedures are often more time-consuming than traditional procedures, at least during the 'learning curve', and they are also usually more expensive compared to open procedures, mainly due to higher operating room costs for laparoscopic surgeries. [ 33 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If patients are given the opportunity to choose provider (CHOICE), providers may also be encouraged to compete for patients and may attract patients with new and expensive technologies, although arguably general competition may also reduce uptake of new technologies if unit costs are higher. As discussed in a number of studies, health care providers' remuneration systems provide incentives with respect to the adoption of various technologies (Greenberg et al 2001; Moïse 2003b; Okunade & Miles 1999; Slade & Anderson 2001). Given the potential importance of these variables, the hospitals' remuneration scheme is described by two dummy variables: H_FFS where health care systems applying fee-for-service (FFS) remuneration systems and H_CASE where health care systems applying per case remuneration (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pediatric implantation is an example of such an intervention. Judgments of the cost-effectiveness of some interventions hinge on whether economic costs incurred by patients and their families are taken into account (Greenberg, Peiser, Peterburg, & Pliskin, 2001;Moore, Speroff, Grogan, Poulose, & Holzman, 2005). In a separate analysis (Barton, Stacey, Fortnum, and Summerfield, 2006b), we combined the economic costs incurred by the family, as estimated in this paper, with estimates of the incremental health-sector costs of implantation and of the change in the costs of compulsory education (Barton et al, 2006a), to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of pediatric cochlear implantation from a societal perspective.…”
Section: Aims Of the Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%