2009
DOI: 10.36366/frontiers.v18i1.269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reimagining the Curriculum in Study Abroad: Globalizing Multiculturalism to Prepare Future Teachers

Abstract: This article discusses research that indicates that the lived experience of studying abroad provides preservice teachers the intellectual and critical starting point for multicultural awareness of the educational, social, and political relationships between their lives and other cultures. With course work and field experiences that are grounded in multicultural life-experience, the authors argue that preservice teachers begin to develop the awareness, sensitivity, and skills they urgently need to bridge the ga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the literature on study abroad provides few frames of reference for how cultural differences such as race, class, and gender affect preservice teachers' experiences while abroad, a few studies have examined how such cross-cultural experiences might be infused into onsite curricula (Bigelow & Peterson, 2002;Engle & Engle, 2004;Hadis, 2005;University of Minnesota, 2005). Studies that specifically explore the ways in which race, class, and gender shape the cultural perceptions of preservice teachers during a study abroad program reveal that preservice teachers have a more complex, nuanced understanding of cross-cultural differences as a result of international field experiences (Phillion, Malewski, Sharma, & Wang, 2009;Talburt & Stewart, 1999). Given the push to increase study abroad programs for preservice teachers, many educational researchers call for future studies on how the cultural knowledge of preservice teachers changes after an international field experience (Ingraham & Peterson, 2004;Merryfield, 2000), and ways in which study abroad programs can prepare preservice teachers for culturally responsive teaching (Barkhuizen & Feryok, 2006;Malewski & Phillion, 2009b;Willard-Holt).…”
Section: A Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the literature on study abroad provides few frames of reference for how cultural differences such as race, class, and gender affect preservice teachers' experiences while abroad, a few studies have examined how such cross-cultural experiences might be infused into onsite curricula (Bigelow & Peterson, 2002;Engle & Engle, 2004;Hadis, 2005;University of Minnesota, 2005). Studies that specifically explore the ways in which race, class, and gender shape the cultural perceptions of preservice teachers during a study abroad program reveal that preservice teachers have a more complex, nuanced understanding of cross-cultural differences as a result of international field experiences (Phillion, Malewski, Sharma, & Wang, 2009;Talburt & Stewart, 1999). Given the push to increase study abroad programs for preservice teachers, many educational researchers call for future studies on how the cultural knowledge of preservice teachers changes after an international field experience (Ingraham & Peterson, 2004;Merryfield, 2000), and ways in which study abroad programs can prepare preservice teachers for culturally responsive teaching (Barkhuizen & Feryok, 2006;Malewski & Phillion, 2009b;Willard-Holt).…”
Section: A Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research that focuses on students’ views on gender in the context of studying abroad has continued since the 1990s, although the number remains limited. There is a common trend among the previous studies; they are mostly case studies targeted for short study-abroad programs conducted by Western universities, and most of the participating students are Caucasian (e.g., Jessup-Anger, 2008 ; Phillion et al, 2009 ; Squire et al, 2015 ; Talburt & Stewart, 1999 ; Twombly, 1995 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instructors utilized some form of qualitative inquiry to assess 13.6% of outcomes; these were typically one-on-one or focus group interviews but occasionally included class activities that had been audio recorded and analyzed thematically. For example, Phillion et al (2009) audio recorded classroom discussions and mealtime group discussions while abroad then transcribed an analyzed these narratives. Traditional academic papers or similar written course assignments were utilized in 13.3% of cases.…”
Section: Outcome Assessment Typementioning
confidence: 99%