2017
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehabilitative post-acute care for stroke patients delivered by per-diem payment system in different hospitalization paths: A Taiwan pilot study

Abstract: The most effective way to reduce the costs of PAC for stroke patients is to minimize the duration of their hospital stay before transfer to rehabilitative PAC. Because it substantially reduces medical costs, rehabilitative PAC should be considered standard care for stroke patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
39
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The global sensitivity analysis of the weights of signi cant predictors of 30-day readmission in the patients with stroke in this study revealed that the best predictor was PAC. This nding is consistent with earlier reports that, compared to all other stroke treatment variables, PAC has the largest effect on outcome in terms of overall treatment cost, functional status after stroke, and duration of hospital stay before transfer to rehabilitative ward [25,28]. Wang et al coupled a natural experimental design with propensity score matching to assess the impact of PAC in stroke patients and to examine the longitudinal effects of PAC on functional status [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The global sensitivity analysis of the weights of signi cant predictors of 30-day readmission in the patients with stroke in this study revealed that the best predictor was PAC. This nding is consistent with earlier reports that, compared to all other stroke treatment variables, PAC has the largest effect on outcome in terms of overall treatment cost, functional status after stroke, and duration of hospital stay before transfer to rehabilitative ward [25,28]. Wang et al coupled a natural experimental design with propensity score matching to assess the impact of PAC in stroke patients and to examine the longitudinal effects of PAC on functional status [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The average length of stay in PAC in our study is 35.01±16.373 days, which is a little longer than previous data of 25.21~34.11 days admitted in PAC for stroke patients in sub-acute phase 3 . Ischemic stroke accounted for 76.7%(n=148) stroke patients and hemorrhagic type accounted for 23.3% (n=45), which is quite compatible with previous essay indicated in 80% of ischemic stroke and 20% of hemorrhagic stroke in epidemiological prevalence 6 .In our study, stroke patients included 60.6% (n=117) male and 39.4%(n=76) female.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The PAC program revealed a more economic 2,3 and better recovery strategy 4 for stroke patient after acute phase. Current essay indicate benefits in ADL function, balance/coordination, walking speed, motor and sensory function of upper extremities after PAC hospitalization 1,5 , and in our study, we found all the improvements of BI, BAL, Gait Speed as well as upper sensory and motor function of FMA correlate to longer stays in PAC for stroke patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Candidate patients in acute ward would first be evaluated by a case manager and may participate in the program if they meet the following criteria: (1) stroke onset time within 1 month, (2) stable hemodynamic parameters within 72 h, (3) no neurological deterioration within 72 h, and (4) sufficient cognitive function and ability to learn rehabilitation exercises, more specifically, with modified Rankin Scale (MRS) between 2 and 4 (between 3 and 4 since July 2017 due to the change in policy). 8,20 Patient would be transferred to PAC hospital for rehabilitation, where a hospital-based multidisciplinary team, composed of a physiatrist, physical therapist, occupational therapist, speech therapist, social worker, and case manager, managed the rehabilitation program.…”
Section: Pac-cvd Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with up to 3 weeks (n=53) and 3 to 6 weeks of PAC (n=132) had better initial mRS and BI than those with 6 to 12 weeks of PAC (n=304) (For patients with 0-3w, 3-6w, and 6-12w of PAC, the mRS-I were 3 [3][4], 3 [3][4], and 4 [3][4], respectively, p<0.01; the BI-I were 55 , 55 , 45 , respectively, p<0.01). Patients with up to 3 weeks of PAC had greater BI improvement during the first 3 weeks than those with 3 to 6 weeks and 6 to 12 weeks of PAC (For patients with 0-3w, 3-6w, and 6-12w of PAC, the ΔBI 0−3w were 10 [5-20], 10 [5-15], 10 [0-15], respectively, p=0.03); patients with 3 to 6 weeks of PAC had greater BI improvement during the first 6 weeks than those with 6 to 12 weeks of PAC (ΔBI 0−6w : 15 vs 15 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], p<0.01).…”
Section: Composition Of the Pac-cvd Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%