2013
DOI: 10.4172/2329-9096.1000147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehabilitation with Functional Electrical Stimulation in Stroke Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that functional electrical stimulation (FES) has a positive effect for rehabilitation of upper limb motor functions in the stroke population. 2,3 Furthermore, it has been reported that the use of FES aids to preserve and restore muscle mass and its function after a period of reduced activity, 4 as well as to stimulate cortical reorganization after the neurological injury. 5 However, the non-physiological motor unit recruitment, the lack of muscle selectivity, and the need of a large amount of power to support the arm during reaching movements hinder the wide use of FES technologies in clinical settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that functional electrical stimulation (FES) has a positive effect for rehabilitation of upper limb motor functions in the stroke population. 2,3 Furthermore, it has been reported that the use of FES aids to preserve and restore muscle mass and its function after a period of reduced activity, 4 as well as to stimulate cortical reorganization after the neurological injury. 5 However, the non-physiological motor unit recruitment, the lack of muscle selectivity, and the need of a large amount of power to support the arm during reaching movements hinder the wide use of FES technologies in clinical settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independent effectiveness of rehabilitation therapies for upper limbs based on robotic devices [109][110] and FES [111][112] has been presented in several publications. Likewise, the joint use of both technologies has shown good results in terms of motor rehabilitation after stroke [113][114].…”
Section: Rehabilitation Robotic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even after completing conventional therapy only 40-50% of stroke patients benefit from this intensive therapy (Schaechter 2004). In particular, stroke patients who had a unilateral paralysis rarely regain walking function to the point of effective ambulation (Hara 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%