“Rehabilitation Research Framework for Patients With COVID-19” Defined by Cochrane Rehabilitation and the World Health Organization Rehabilitation Programme

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in surge of research activity. Since its outset, efforts have been made to guide the rapid generation of research in medicine. There are gaps in some areas of rehabilitation research for patients with COVID-19. The development of a specific research framework might serve to help monitor the status of research (mapping), shape and strengthen research by pointing to under-investigated areas, and promote rehabilitation research in this context. This paper introduces and discusses the COVID-19 Rehabilitation Research Framework (CRRF) and presents the methodology used for its development. The questions have been developed among the World Health Organization Rehabilitation Programme, Cochrane Rehabilitation and the experts of its REH-COVER (Rehabilitation – COVID-19 Evidence-based Response) Action International Multiprofessional Steering Committee. The framework is divided into two parts and includes 20 questions organized in four groups: epidemiology, and evidence at the micro- (individual), meso- (health services) and macro- (health systems) level. The CRRF offers a comprehensive view of the research areas relevant to COVID-19 and rehabilitation that are necessary to inform best practice and ensure rehabilitation services and health systems can best serve the COVID-19 population. The collaboration between Cochrane Rehabilitation and the WHO Rehabilitation Programme in establishing the CRRF brought together perspectives from the health systems, health management and clinical evidence. The authors encourage researchers to use the CRRF when planning studies on rehabilitation in the context of COVID-19.

Care Models for Long COVID : A Rapid Systematic Review

“…Unfortunately, shortcomings started appearing such as long waiting lists, difficulties training clinicians, barriers to access for patients with fatigue living outside city areas, absence of integrated multidisciplinary rehabilitation and long-term funding sustainability, warranting a more integrated care model for Long COVID. Critical and central to this proposed integrated care model was primary care 13,[22][23][24][25][26][27] .…”

Legal Regulation For Sustainable Health Care Systems: International Experience

“…In recent years the world community has paid special attention to the operation of the national healthcare systems. The polycentricity of the principles governing the provision of medical care to the population changes considerably due to the spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus infection (Negrini et al, 2021), which has altered the established structures of international relations and cooperation in basic forms of health care. The strengths and weaknesses of the public health national models became apparent.…”

Long COVID and episodic disability: advancing the conceptualisation, measurement and knowledge of episodic disability among people living with Long COVID – protocol for a mixed-methods study

“…This study addresses priorities outlined by the Long COVID community99 and COVID-19 Rehabilitation Research Framework100 highlighting the need to measure disability to inform best practices and policies for rehabilitation. The framework and Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) that emerges from this work may yield potential to lay the groundwork for future disability measurement in Long COVID and more broadly across other complex episodic illness 55…”