1991
DOI: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1991.tb01231.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehabilitation of Swallowing and Communication Following Glossectomy

Abstract: Patients who have had surgical removal of part or all of the tongue are left with varying degrees of swallowing and speech deficiencies. The extent of resection, mobility of the residual tongue segment, and adequacy of the remaining structures determine the amount and type of deficiency. While communicative impairment and dysphagia commonly are seen in a rehabilitation setting, the problems of the glossectomy patient often are unique. This article reviews the anatomy and physiology of the oral and pharyngeal m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with Borggreven et al [54], who found that patients with oral cavity tumors (vs. oropharyngeal tumors) and patients with T3-T4 tumors (vs. T2 tumors) had worse speech and oral function scores, which is in contrast to the results of earlier studies [72,73]. Ablative surgery that involves the most anterior portion of the tongue is associated with significantly altered speech, whereas resections that incorporate the posterior tongue affect swallowing [38]. Adjunctive radiotherapy further impairs speech and swallowing; this is also in agreement with the results of this study, in which patients who received radiotherapy and surgery and radiotherapy showed the statistically significant lowest mean score.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in agreement with Borggreven et al [54], who found that patients with oral cavity tumors (vs. oropharyngeal tumors) and patients with T3-T4 tumors (vs. T2 tumors) had worse speech and oral function scores, which is in contrast to the results of earlier studies [72,73]. Ablative surgery that involves the most anterior portion of the tongue is associated with significantly altered speech, whereas resections that incorporate the posterior tongue affect swallowing [38]. Adjunctive radiotherapy further impairs speech and swallowing; this is also in agreement with the results of this study, in which patients who received radiotherapy and surgery and radiotherapy showed the statistically significant lowest mean score.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Complications with eradication of disease include failure to cure the disease [35,36], altered masticatory function and nutrition [37], speech and swallowing disruption [38][39][40], disfigurement [36], osteoradionecrosis in patients who have received doses of radiation for head and neck malignancies in excess of 6000 cGy [41,42], xerostomia [43] as residual saliva tends to be thick and viscous and loses its ability to lubricate, cleanse, and protect, in addition to reconstruction and donor-site morbidity such as unesthetic scar, hardware failure, and tissue deficits [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, surgical ablation that involves the most anterior region of the tongue is often associated with significant speech alteration, whereas ablation that incorporates the posterior tongue affects swallowing [2629]. With tumor ablation and the subsequent loss of a significant portion of the tongue, the manipulation and formation of the bolus (the oral preparatory phase) and the transfer of bolus from the anterior oral cavity to the posterior tonsillar area (the initiation of the swallowing reflex) are severely restricted [30].…”
Section: Oral Complications Of Cancer Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Swallowing function in these patients may be affected by the degree of resection and the nature of reconstruction. [1][2][3][4][5] Swallowing function in these patients may be affected by the degree of resection and the nature of reconstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%