2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.19.21252082
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehabilitation clinicians’ perspectives of reactive balance training

Abstract: Purpose: Reactive balance training (RBT) aims to improve reactive balance control. However, because RBT involves clients losing balance, clinicians may view that it is unsafe or not feasible for some clients. We aimed to explore how clinicians are specifically implementing RBT to treat balance and mobility issues. Materials and methods: Physiotherapists and kinesiologists across Canada who reported that they include RBT in their practices were invited to complete telephone interviews about their experience wi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding highlights the need to build trust between the therapist and client to alleviate these anxieties. 59 Therapists report that, as clients gradually overcome these anxieties with training, RBT can help to build self-efficacy and a sense of achievement. 59 Findings regarding adverse events should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding highlights the need to build trust between the therapist and client to alleviate these anxieties. 59 Therapists report that, as clients gradually overcome these anxieties with training, RBT can help to build self-efficacy and a sense of achievement. 59 Findings regarding adverse events should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Therapists report that, as clients gradually overcome these anxieties with training, RBT can help to build self-efficacy and a sense of achievement. 59 Findings regarding adverse events should be interpreted with caution. Fifteen studies that met most of our inclusion criteria were not included in the review because they did not monitor adverse events, and six trials that were included in the current review did not monitor adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%