Rehabilitation Barriers Recognized in a Geriatric Patient after Cardiac Revascularization Procedure

Goodwin-Esola, Marlene Joy; Gatti, Gloria; Chokshi, Bella

doi:10.3109/02703181.2014.914619

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Poorly Coordinated Processes: Referrals for ICR were inconsistent across the system and more likely to be provided when there was infrastructure that allowed for easy communication and collaboration (eg electronic medical record sharing between discharging and receiving facilities). 180 A lack of referrals and poor cross-regional collaborations (eg not having healthcare alliances across the region) acted as a barrier to patient participation in ICR. Acute care centres offering very early ICR did not always offer referrals to continue CR in an outpatient or tertiary setting.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

Wasilewski,

Vijayakumar,

Szigeti

et al. 2023

JMDH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize the literature on barriers and facilitators that influence the provision and uptake of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (ICR). Methods A literature search was conducted using PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AgeLine. Studies were included if they were published in English after the year 2000 and focused on adults who were receiving some form of ICR (eg, exercise counselling and training, education for heart-healthy living). For studies meeting inclusion criteria, descriptive data on authors, year, study design, and intervention type were extracted. Results The literature search resulted in a total of 44,331 publications, of which 229 studies met inclusion criteria. ICR programs vary drastically and often focus on promoting physical exercises and patient education. Barriers and facilitators were categorized through patient, provider and system level factors. Individual characteristics and provider knowledge and efficacy were categorized as both barriers and facilitators to ICR delivery and uptake. Team functioning, lack of resources, program coordination, and inconsistencies in evaluation acted as key barriers to ICR delivery and uptake. Key facilitators that influence ICR implementation and engagement include accreditation and professional associations and patient and family-centred practices. Conclusion ICR programs can be highly effective at improving health outcomes for those living with CVDs. Our review identified several patient, provider, and system-level considerations that act as barriers and facilitators to ICR delivery and uptake. Future research should explore how to encourage health promotion knowledge amongst ICR staff and patients.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

Wasilewski,

Vijayakumar,

Szigeti

et al. 2023

JMDH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Rehabilitation Barriers Recognized in a Geriatric Patient after Cardiac Revascularization Procedure

Abstract: Phys Occup Ther Geriatr Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Selcuk Universitesi on 02/05/15For personal use only.

Cited by 1 publication

References 5 publications

Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About