1995
DOI: 10.1177/030802269505800304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehabilitation and Special Education: Measuring Outcomes in Mentally Retarded Children in India

Abstract: Amethod ofmeasuring and recording change in scored performance (the outcome) Is described, based on the Individual Education Programmes of mentally retarded children over time. This method Is being piloted at the Tropical Health Foundation of India with children whose handicaps are in the mild to severe categories. (The pilot excludes children with profound handicap.) This article Is adapted from a paper published in ACTIONAID Disability News 1995, Volume 6, Number 1, by kind permission of ACTIONAID, Bangalore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, most accounts are by therapists from the dominant sociocultural group, working with 'others' who generally belong to marginalised or socioeconomically and politically disadvantaged subgroups. Another facet of the literature linked to practice has been the critique of the cross-cultural validity (or otherwise) of specific assessments and analyses of occupational performance differentials (Jamieson 1985, Cusick and Harai 1991, Evans and Salim 1992, Fisher et al 1992, Dyck 1993, Spencer et al 1993, Paul 1995, Sutcliffe 1995.…”
Section: Preparing For Sociocultural Diversity: Occupational Therapy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, most accounts are by therapists from the dominant sociocultural group, working with 'others' who generally belong to marginalised or socioeconomically and politically disadvantaged subgroups. Another facet of the literature linked to practice has been the critique of the cross-cultural validity (or otherwise) of specific assessments and analyses of occupational performance differentials (Jamieson 1985, Cusick and Harai 1991, Evans and Salim 1992, Fisher et al 1992, Dyck 1993, Spencer et al 1993, Paul 1995, Sutcliffe 1995.…”
Section: Preparing For Sociocultural Diversity: Occupational Therapy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most apparent is that which consists of practice accounts related to working with culturally different clients in specific settings (Evans, 1992a;Fudge, 1992;Haig, 1993;Markewitz, 1992;Miller, 1992;Wilson-Braun, 1992). Another facet of the literature linked to practice has been the critique of the cross-cultural validity (or otherwise) of specific assessments and analyses of occupational performance differentials (Cusick & Harai, 1991;Dyck, 1993;Evans, 1992b;Fisher, Liu, Velozo & Pan, 1992;Jamieson, 1985;Paul, 1995;Spencer, Krefting & Mattingly, 1993;Sutcliffe, 1995). Notably, most accounts are by therapists from the dominant sociocultural group working with those who generally belong to marginalised or socioeconomically and politically disadvantaged subgroups.…”
Section: Occupational Therapy and Intercultural Competence: Theory Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, most accounts are by therapists from the dominant sociocultural group working with those who generally belong to marginalised or socioeconomically and politically disadvantaged subgroups. Another facet of the literature linked to practice has been the critique of the cross-cultural validity (or otherwise) of specific assessments and analyses of occupational performance differentials (Cusick & Harai, 1991;Dyck, 1993;Evans, 1992b;Fisher, Liu, Velozo & Pan, 1992;Jamieson, 1985;Paul, 1995;Spencer, Krefting & Mattingly, 1993;Sutcliffe, 1995). This literature has been significant in bringing to the attention of the professional community that assessment protocols are always cultural constructions, as are evaluations of performance.…”
Section: Occupational Therapy and Intercultural Competence: Theory Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%