Regulatory Transparency in OECD Countries: Overview, Trends and Challenges

Abstract

The concept of transparency has rapidly gained prominence in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. It is particularly associated with the rise of the governance agenda, as transparency is a core governance value. The regulatory activities of government constitute one of the main contexts within which transparency must be assured. There is a strong public demand for greater transparency, which is substantially related to the rapid increase in number and influence of nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) or 'civil society groups', as well as to increasingly well educated and diverse populations.Transparency initiatives now form a major part of the regulatory policies of many OECD countries: in 2000, 20 of the 30 OECD member countries had government-wide transparency policies (OECD 2002a). Many OECD countries have now made substantial investments in improved regulatory transparency, and have reaped important gains in terms of regulatory quality, legitimacy and accountability.However, despite these gains, the results have in many cases fallen short of expectations. As well, the implementation of transparency has itself led to new stresses and problems within the regulatory process. This article considers why regulatory transparency is important and points to some of the main trends in improving regulatory transparency. It also considers a range of problems and issues that arise and suggests means of resolving these.

The legal‐normative conditions of police transparency: A configurational approach to open data adoption using qualitative comparative analysis

“…For example, FOI laws are supported by a lobby of non‐governmental stakeholders that shape norms by watching and criticizing public organizations for undue lapses into secrecy or manipulation of public information (Worthy ). Large cities have a large number and diversity of such stakeholders as well as highly educated citizens, which contributes to a normative environment of government information sharing and public participation (Deighton‐Smith ; Guillamón et al ).…”

Legitimacy and context: implications for public sector reform in developing countries

“…Unfulfilled promises, failure to provide legitimacy to managers' decisions and disregard for political matters are a few reasons why NPM prestige faded away (Ferlie et al, 1996;Cohn, 1997;Maor, 1999;Box et al, 2001;Lynn, 2001;Salway, 2001;Pollitt and Bouckaert, 2004). NPM's legitimacy deficit has sparkled interest in participatory procedures, accountability and transparency (Thompson, 1995;Blair, 2000;Lowndes et al, 2001a,b;Souza, 2001;Doig and McIvor, 2003;Deighton-Smith, 2004;Wampler and Avritzer, 2004). This change of spirits can be noted both in developed and developing countries.…”

Governing Infrastructure Regulators in Fragile Environments: Principles and Implementation Manual

“…The report concludes with nine "guiding lessons" for reformers. Deighton-Smith (2004) considers transparency as a core governance value and highlights the increasing recognition of its importance in OECD countries. However, the article concludes that, despite many new initiatives intended to enhance transparency, results have often fallen short of expectations.…”