Regulatory Translations: Expertise and Affect in Global Legal Fields

Türem, Z. Umut; Ballestero, Andrea

doi:10.2979/indjglolegstu.21.1.1

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We approach translation as a nondeterministic act of meaning and value creation that accounts for the differences across different spatial contexts and for the need of conversions when transferring knowledge from one context to another (Türem and Ballestero 2014). The use of translation as an analytic resists binaries such as center/periphery, developed/developing, and global/local, and allows more hermeneutic complexity (Savcı 2021).…”

Section: Rethinking Institutionalization Of Sts In Turkeymentioning

confidence: 99%

Placing STS in and through Turkey

Alkan,

Kaşdoğan,

Erol

2023

Engaging STS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Why and how does it matter to undertake an STS praxis in a country where the field lacks adequate institutional recognition and capacity? This article investigates this question by tracing multiple, fragmented and contingent stories of placing STS in and through Turkey. At first sight, discontinuous stories of STS programs established in universities and unrecognized nature of STS as a discipline by the Council of Higher Education draw attention to the “underdeveloped” nature of the field in this country. This article counters such a perspective by rendering visible the works that support STS ethos as well as loose institutions within which STS is expected to flourish. By following people and artifacts in institutional and more-than institutional places of STS, this article acknowledges the efforts both to translate STS into the particular places of Turkey and to use STS as an intellectual space through which technoscientific knowledge can be questioned and translated into the local contexts of the country. The analysis of these translation efforts reveals that STS can be thought of as a space that enables one to be attuned to the sensibilities and realities of the country and search for ways to democratize the processes of technoscientific knowledge production whether it be in the universities or in public spaces.

show abstract

Section: Rethinking Institutionalization Of Sts In Turkeymentioning

confidence: 99%

Placing STS in and through Turkey

Alkan,

Kaşdoğan,

Erol

2023

Engaging STS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ultimately, the reference repository featured 70 records (see Table 1). 15 The results of the systematic literature review for legal technology and legal tech were solely based on an analysis limited to selected three databases of scientific sources (ProQuest, Ebsco, and JSTOR), to provide certainty in terms of the mode of their publication, review procedure, and methodological rigor (Conn et al, 2003). Disregarding 'grey literature' included in the Google Scholar database helped arrive at the reference repository composition reflecting the current state of the global body of research (Hempel et al, 2016).…”

Section: Bibliometric Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three appeared in the journal Judicature published by the Bolch Judicial Institute Duke Law School ([01], [06], [08]) and in The Florida Bar Journal [50], [52], [53]). Two each were published in Family Law Quarterly ([09], [10]), Legal Information Management ([02], [21]), Artificial Intelligence and Law ( [30], [31]), American Journal of Trial Advocacy ( [44], [46]), International Review of Law, Computers & Technology [35], [58]), University of Ottawa Press ( [60], [61]), and Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies ( [15], [63]). The remaining journals included one text each on a given topic: Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics [03], The Journal of Equipment Lease Financing [04], Future Internet [05], Technology Innovation Management Review [07], Iowa Law Review [11], International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care [14], Union of Jurists of Romanis Law Review [16], Systemic Practice and Action Research [18], Revista Direito GV [20], Northwestern University Law Review [22], Journal of Nursing Law [23], The Entrepreneurial Executive [24], Texas Law Review [26], Journal of Digital Asset Management [27], Information Systems Frontiers [28], Journal of Financial Service Professionals [29], Federal Communications Law Journal [33], International review of Law, Computers & Technology [35], IT Professional [36], International Financial Law Review [37], Daedalus [38], IEEE Transaction...…”

Section: Bibliometric Analysis Focused On the Selection Of The Journal Research Questions And Abstractmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Following the structure posited by the authors, they covered six stages (Table 2). 17 LEGAL SERVICE (15) TECHNOLOGY ( 14) AI ( 7 In phase one (Getting familiar with the data), I examined in detail the data selected at an earlier stage in the process of setting a reference repository. The process of repeated reading of all 70 articles aimed at actively looking for patterns and starting to develop guidelines as regards further content-coding (King, 2004;Nowell et al, 2017).…”

Section: Thematic Analysis Of the Reference Repositorymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Legal Technology: Assessment of the Legal Tech Industry’s Potential

Mania

2022

J Knowl Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in the sector of legal services has resulted in the emergence of a new category of services known as legal technology (legal tech). This article aims at defining the current state of research concerning the matter, confirming its interdisciplinary nature and examining the level of its popularity. The strategy assumed for the article has influenced the order and sequence of the topics covered starting from an introduction to legal technology together with analysis of the context of the definition of the term (legal tech) (“Introduction” section), through a detailed discussion of the methodology of systematic literature review, its results and an appraisal of the popularity of the notions (“Materials and Methods” and “Bibliometric Analysis” sections), the application of the thematic analysis method (“Thematic Analysis of the Reference Repository” section), Google Trends analysis (“Analysis of the Popularity of the Terms ‘Legal Technology’ or ‘Legal Tech’ (Google Trends)” section), and finally the conclusions (“Conclusions” section). The research methodology covers a systematic literature review, quantitative bibliometric analysis, the thematic analysis method, and — complementarily — popularity analysis performed using the Google Trends analytical tool. The article confirms the multidisciplinary nature of legal technology as a subject matter, indicating the thematic categories corresponding with the notion under investigation. It contains a description of the geographical segmentation and difference in that regard at a global level. The author has verified the presence of publications on legal technology and shown that the future of the legal services sector lies in an interdisciplinary juxtaposition of the classic legal sciences with entirely new areas, i.e. IT, artificial intelligence, and data analysis.

show abstract

Sociedad, epistemología y metodología en Boaventura de Sousa Santos

Espinoza

Tonioni

2017

conrec

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El objetivo de esta publicación es analizar la obra de Boaventura de Sousa Santos, especialmente su comprensión de las sociedades contemporáneas y los desafíos epistemológicos y metodológicos actuales. Mediante una revisión documental de su obra y aportes críticos de otros autores, se distingue su comprensión crítica y utópica de las sociedades actuales, y la necesidad de renovación de los procesos de construcción de conocimiento. Los aportes de este trabajo son, por una parte, integrar la crítica de Santos a la modernidad con su propuesta utópica, y su relación con las epistemologías del sur, la ecología de saberes y la traducción intercultural. Por otra parte, la identificación de estrategias concretas de generación de saberes desde una perspectiva intercultural. Las conclusiones están orientadas hacia una evaluación crítica de la discusión desarrollada con Santos, y su relevancia en el contexto de las ciencias sociales latinoamericanas.

show abstract

Regulatory Translations: Expertise and Affect in Global Legal Fields

Cited by 3 publications

References 21 publications

Placing STS in and through Turkey

Placing STS in and through Turkey

Legal Technology: Assessment of the Legal Tech Industry’s Potential

Sociedad, epistemología y metodología en Boaventura de Sousa Santos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About