2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory Potential of the RNA Processing Machinery: Implications for Human Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They recognize mRNAs during early stages of biogenesis and transfer the mature, spliced mRNAs to the NXF1:NXT1 nuclear export factor, which facilitates their export to the cytoplasm through interactions with the FG repeats of nucleoporins. TREX is recruited to mRNAs during splicing (18). TREX-2 is based on a GANP scaffold to which PCID2, DSSI, ENY2 and CETN2/3 bind (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They recognize mRNAs during early stages of biogenesis and transfer the mature, spliced mRNAs to the NXF1:NXT1 nuclear export factor, which facilitates their export to the cytoplasm through interactions with the FG repeats of nucleoporins. TREX is recruited to mRNAs during splicing (18). TREX-2 is based on a GANP scaffold to which PCID2, DSSI, ENY2 and CETN2/3 bind (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the conventional view has been that dysregulated transcription and signaling are the drivers of cancer, it is clear that dysregulated RNA processing in its many forms (eg, RNA trafficking, translation, stability, splicing, etc) contributes to the oncogenic phenotype and is targetable in malignancies. 8,9 AML has already been characterized to have dysregulated RNA processing, including elevated export of RNAs that support malignancy, increased translation, and dysregulated splicing, and these processes can be targeted in patients corresponding to clinical benefit. [8][9][10] The report by Beauchamp et al provides novel insights into the mechanisms that can dysregulate translation and transcription in AML and provides means to exploit these to identify next-generation strategies to target these processes in the clinic.…”
Section: Rictormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 AML has already been characterized to have dysregulated RNA processing, including elevated export of RNAs that support malignancy, increased translation, and dysregulated splicing, and these processes can be targeted in patients corresponding to clinical benefit. [8][9][10] The report by Beauchamp et al provides novel insights into the mechanisms that can dysregulate translation and transcription in AML and provides means to exploit these to identify next-generation strategies to target these processes in the clinic. The landmark study published in 2000 by Döhner and coworkers demonstrated that 80% of CLL cases could be risk stratified based on the presence of 4 recurrent abnormalities detectable by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis performed on interphase (nondividing) nuclei: del(13)(q14.1), trisomy 12, del(11)(q22-23), and del(17)(p13.1).…”
Section: Rictormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA processing factors function in intron removal and regulate alternative splicing events (ASEs) of eukaryotic genes. Aberrant selective RNA processing, especially alternative splicing (AS), facilitates cancer development and progression via alterations in protein structure, nonsense‐mediated mRNA decay, DNA repair defects and genome instability 8,9 . In CRC, several RNA processing factors, including HNRNPLL , SRSF1 , SRSF3 and SRSF6 , have been shown to actively participate in tumour progression and have demonstrated prognostic value, indicating that genetic alterations affecting RNA splicing are associated with CRC pathogenesis 10‐13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%