2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory or expropriatory? On the implications of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership for the German land policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In its physical terms, the territory serves as a means of gaining benefits for people [20] -to cultivate agricultural products, construct residential dwellings [4] and recreational areas, protect healthy environment [21] and ecology to provide proper living conditions for the nation [22], etc. And in this regard, it is necessary to carry out the project work, which should precede the development of the territory in a particular area, taking into account some factors influencing the process.…”
Section: Territory Development Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its physical terms, the territory serves as a means of gaining benefits for people [20] -to cultivate agricultural products, construct residential dwellings [4] and recreational areas, protect healthy environment [21] and ecology to provide proper living conditions for the nation [22], etc. And in this regard, it is necessary to carry out the project work, which should precede the development of the territory in a particular area, taking into account some factors influencing the process.…”
Section: Territory Development Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consideration of this topic in the framework of stimulating investment activity and building an innovative economy in China [21], Germany [22], Peru and Colombia [23], the Russian Federation [24,25] is very important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inherent power to reconsider the issue arises as a result of the absence of clear guidance on the topic, which risks leaving parties and arbitrators adrift when confronted with difficult situations for which the parties' agreement or the arbitral rules provide no roadmap. Besides, since reconsideration power is included as inherent powers that are basically controversial on its own, therefore the lengthy debates and various interpretations over tribunals' power to reconsider its former decision can be recognized (Thiel, 2018). Following this issue is the question that relates to arbitral tribunal's power to grant a request for revising or reconsidering its previous partial decisions when challenged with the finality and binding principle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%