2017
DOI: 10.7554/elife.28921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory network structure determines patterns of intermolecular epistasis

Abstract: Most phenotypes are determined by molecular systems composed of specifically interacting molecules. However, unlike for individual components, little is known about the distributions of mutational effects of molecular systems as a whole. We ask how the distribution of mutational effects of a transcriptional regulatory system differs from the distributions of its components, by first independently, and then simultaneously, mutating a transcription factor and the associated promoter it represses. We find that th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(47 reference statements)
7
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that these epistatic interactions can also be predicted if the corresponding GRN, its regulatory mechanism and the effect of mutations in single regulatory regions are known. This observation complements a recent study suggesting that epistatic interactions between mutations in transcription factors and DNA binding sites are determined by regulatory network structure (Lagator et al , 2017b). Ultimately, understanding the nonlinearities inherent in complex biological systems will be essential to understand how such systems constrain the production of phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results suggest that these epistatic interactions can also be predicted if the corresponding GRN, its regulatory mechanism and the effect of mutations in single regulatory regions are known. This observation complements a recent study suggesting that epistatic interactions between mutations in transcription factors and DNA binding sites are determined by regulatory network structure (Lagator et al , 2017b). Ultimately, understanding the nonlinearities inherent in complex biological systems will be essential to understand how such systems constrain the production of phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Table 1 ). The shape of the DFE in our experiment was similar to DFEs observed in other biological systems, such as mutations in bacterial promoters [ 19 , 20 ], viral sequences [ 21 ], transcription factors [ 22 ], and random transposon insertions [ 18 ]. The effect of the deleterious transferred genes is well described by a log-normal distribution ( μ = − 3.562 and σ = 1.693), as previously observed for DMEs of mutations [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Our results suggest that these epistatic interactions can also be predicted, if the corresponding GRN, its regulatory mechanism, and the effect of mutations in single regulatory regions are known. This observation complements a recent study suggesting that epistatic interactions between mutations in transcription factors and DNA-binding sites are determined by regulatory network structure (Lagator et al, 2017b). Ultimately, understanding the nonlinearities inherent in complex biological systems will be essential to understand how such systems constrain the production of phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%