Regulatory influences on health-related behaviours: The case of workplace smoking-bans

Abstract

Recent community-wide health-promotion campaigns in Australia d other industrialised countries have been concerned with reducing cardiovascular disease and cancer risk, and have focused on such behaviours as cigarette smoking. dietary choices, and exercising. Psychological research on the modification of health-related behaviours has largely been concerned with individual learning and behaviourchange processes, emphasising an implicit sequence of providing information. promoting motivation, and facilitating behaviour change. But governments and public-health activists are now also sponsoring regulatory innovations which directly influence health-related behaviours. Bans on cigarette smoking in enclosed public places to protect the health of nonsmokers are an example of such regulatory innova tions, and have recently been implemented in many public and private sector workplaces in Australia.We discuss the findings of studies which show that workplace smoking bans result in changes in the behaviour and attitudes of smokers, that levels of acceptance of these regulations increase following their implementation, and that attitude changes seem to follow changes in behaviour. We also consider some of the social and ethical issues which arise, and some of the more general implications for research on the relationships between regulatory innovations, behaviour change and attitude change in the preventive-health and environmental-protection areas.

The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: Attitude change and behavioural spillover effects

“…Research on smoking bans has shown that they became more acceptable after coming into force. Smokers as well as non-smokers have been found to express more support for bans after the benefits of the ban became apparent (Borland et al, 1990;Owen et al, 1991;Seo et al, 2011). Congestion charges are considered around the world to curb urban traffic.…”

Radical behaviorist interpretation: Generating and evaluating an account of consumer behavior

“…On occasion, customers are channeled into a holding area, such as the bar annexed to a restaurant, until a table becomes free. Ultimately, unauthorized entrance may be entirely precluded, say by the banning of smokers (Owen, Borland, & Hill, 1991). Second, managers control the capacity of the setting.…”