2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory approaches to obesity prevention: A systematic overview of current laws addressing diet-related risk factors in the European Union and the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Globally, the advertising of highly palatable discretionary foods has become a target for improving diets and preventing obesity, although governments vary in their approach to dealing with advertising . Sisnowski et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, the advertising of highly palatable discretionary foods has become a target for improving diets and preventing obesity, although governments vary in their approach to dealing with advertising . Sisnowski et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventions, including mandatory nutrition labelling for packaged foods, marketing restrictions, food reformulation limits and taxes have been introduced in a number of jurisdictions globally. 1,2 These examples stand in contrast to the Australian experience, where the implementation of regulations has been hindered by political and ideological resistance. 3 Australian policymakers have acknowledged that regulatory reform for obesity prevention is likely to depend on public support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Advocacy for obesity regulations is strong in Australia, despite slow progress by international standards. Interventions, including mandatory nutrition labelling for packaged foods, marketing restrictions, food reformulation limits and taxes have been introduced in a number of jurisdictions globally . These examples stand in contrast to the Australian experience, where the implementation of regulations has been hindered by political and ideological resistance .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is the Nordic ‘keyhole’, a symbol geared towards helping consumers to identify healthier food alternatives. It has been adopted in Sweden, Denmark and Norway and is assigned to some products based on a system of cut‐off points for maximum fat, sugar, salt and minimum dietary fibre (Sisnowski et al., ). Furthermore, there are several colour‐based coding schemes that may be adopted to indicate the value of nutrient content according to different colours, such as the UK Traffic Light and the French Nutri‐Score.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Nutrition Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has become quite common in the EU. In all cases Member States still have considerable manoeuvring space to regulate voluntary indications, which do not have to follow the EU regulation's supremacy (Sisnowski et al., ).
…”
Section: A Brief History Of Nutrition Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%