2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3802115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulator Continuity and Decision-Making Quality: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Security commissions in capital markets periodically scrutinize corporate reporting and submit comment letters to firms. This regulatory scrutiny motivates the firms to better address corporate reporting issues that lead to higher information quality for stakeholders (Bills, Cating, Lin, & Seidel, 2020;Kubic & Toynbee, 2021). However, managers view this scrutiny as an important matter, demanding their awareness as the review processes need substantial time and effort to deal with the issues and are likely to lead to negative outcomes such as negative investor perceptions (Shroff, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Security commissions in capital markets periodically scrutinize corporate reporting and submit comment letters to firms. This regulatory scrutiny motivates the firms to better address corporate reporting issues that lead to higher information quality for stakeholders (Bills, Cating, Lin, & Seidel, 2020;Kubic & Toynbee, 2021). However, managers view this scrutiny as an important matter, demanding their awareness as the review processes need substantial time and effort to deal with the issues and are likely to lead to negative outcomes such as negative investor perceptions (Shroff, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As comissões de valores mobiliários nos mercados de capitais examinam periodicamente os relatórios corporativos e enviam cartas de comentários às empresas. Esse escrutínio regulatório motiva as empresas a melhor abordar as questões referentes a relatórios corporativos que possam oferecer informação de maior qualidade a seus stakeholders (Bills, Cating, Lin & Seidel, 2020;Kubic & Toynbee, 2021). No entanto, os gestores buscam encontrar formas de mitigar esse escrutínio, consierando-o um procedimento importante e que merece sua atenção, já que envolve processos de revisão que demandam substancial tempo e esforço em lidar com eventuais problemas, além de provavelmente levar a resultados negativos -sendo percebidos negativamente pelos investidores (Shroff, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified