We assessed the ability of human uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) to uncouple mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation when expressed in yeast at physiological and supraphysiological levels. We used three different inducible UCP2 expression constructs to achieve mitochondrial UCP2 expression levels in yeast of 33, 283, and 4100 ng of UCP2/mg of mitochondrial protein. Yeast mitochondria expressing UCP2 at 33 or 283 ng/mg showed no increase in proton conductance, even in the presence of various putative effectors, including palmitate and all-trans-retinoic acid. Only when UCP2 expression in yeast mitochondria was increased to 4 g/mg, more than an order of magnitude greater than the highest known physiological concentration, was proton conductance increased. This increased proton conductance was not abolished by GDP. At this high level of UCP2 expression, an inhibition of substrate oxidation was observed, which cannot be readily explained by an uncoupling activity of UCP2. Quantitatively, even the uncoupling seen at 4 g/mg was insufficient to account for the basal proton conductance of mammalian mitochondria. These observations suggest that uncoupling of yeast mitochondria by UCP2 is an overexpression artifact leading to compromised mitochondrial integrity.
Uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1)1 uncouples brown adipose tissue mitochondria, causing physiologically important, hormonally regulated, thermogenic proton cycling across the inner membrane. The functions of the UCP1 homologues, UCP2 and UCP3 (1-4), are currently uncertain (5-12). They have been demonstrated to uncouple mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in a number of experimental models, including proteoliposomes (13), yeast heterologous expression systems (1, 2, 14 -16), and transgenic mice (17). It is clear that, under some experimental conditions, heterologous or transgenic expression of these proteins can cause an increase in the proton conductance of the inner membrane (16, 18). However, it is less obvious whether these experimental observations of uncoupling are due to a native protein activity of the UCP1 homologues, or represent a more general disruption of mitochondrial function. None of the effects observed in genetically manipulated model systems has been repeated in natural systems where changes in the levels of UCP2 and/or UCP3 occur as a response to some environmental or physiological condition (19 -21).We have demonstrated that expression of UCP1 in yeast mitochondria can cause a nonspecific uncoupling that is not due to protein activity per se (22,23). This uncoupling artifact is present only at higher levels of UCP1 expression. At these levels, UCP1 expression in yeast also interferes with mitochondrial substrate oxidation. Similarly, Heidkaemper et al. (24) have concluded that both UCP1 and UCP3 can be expressed in an incompetent form that interferes with ATP production. They suggest that most of the UCP3 expressed in yeast mitochondria is nonfunctional. There is considerable evidence that, under some expression regimes, a substantial proportion o...