2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of the timing of MNTB neurons by short-term and long-term modulation of potassium channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The good match found here between model and LSO data suggests that membrane heterogeneity can be simplified into differences in the amplitude and dynamics of AHP. In attempting to relate this simple model to actual membrane characteristics in the LSO, it seems likely that the AHP-related response patterns studied here arise from activity of a number of ionic channels, including low-threshold potassium channels (I LTK ), hyperpolarization-actived inward currents (I h ), and inwardly rectifying potassium currents (I kir ) that have been observed in the LSO (Adam et al 2001;BarnesDavies et al 2004); calcium-dependent potassium channels (I K(Ca) ) as proposed by Zacksenhouse et al (1998); and/or sodium-activated potassium channels that have been observed in MNTB neurons (Kaczmarek et al 2005). Because the adaptation channel in our model has only two parameters, it merely simulates the time-varying shunting effect of cationic channels (most likely the potassium channels) and not their detailed biophysical properties.…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Intrinsic Properties Among Lso Cellsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The good match found here between model and LSO data suggests that membrane heterogeneity can be simplified into differences in the amplitude and dynamics of AHP. In attempting to relate this simple model to actual membrane characteristics in the LSO, it seems likely that the AHP-related response patterns studied here arise from activity of a number of ionic channels, including low-threshold potassium channels (I LTK ), hyperpolarization-actived inward currents (I h ), and inwardly rectifying potassium currents (I kir ) that have been observed in the LSO (Adam et al 2001;BarnesDavies et al 2004); calcium-dependent potassium channels (I K(Ca) ) as proposed by Zacksenhouse et al (1998); and/or sodium-activated potassium channels that have been observed in MNTB neurons (Kaczmarek et al 2005). Because the adaptation channel in our model has only two parameters, it merely simulates the time-varying shunting effect of cationic channels (most likely the potassium channels) and not their detailed biophysical properties.…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Intrinsic Properties Among Lso Cellsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, Ca v 1.3 Ϫ/Ϫ LSO neurons appear to be structurally and functionally integrated into the brainstem circuitry. However, currents through ␣-DTX-sensitive potassium channels contribute to short EPSPs and high reliability and temporal fidelity of synaptic transmission (Brew and Forsythe, 1995;Kaczmarek et al, 2005). They also determine the rate and timing of APs (Dodson et al, 2002) and thus preserve (and possibly enhance) phase-locking behavior.…”
Section: Possible Causes Of the Impaired Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in auditory nerve activity following deafness have been shown to induce changes in excitability and response properties in the cochlear nucleus (Francis and Manis, 2000;Kaltenbach and Afman, 2000;Kanold and Manis, 2005;Wang and Manis, 2005) and inferior colliculus (Bledsoe et al, 1995(Bledsoe et al, , 1997Mossop et al, 2000;Salvi et al, 2000;Syka and Rybalko, 2000;Vale and Sanes, 2002;Vale et al, 2004) (for reviews Moller, 2005;Syka, 2002). While the acoustic environment has been shown to influence auditory brain stem responses through modulation of voltage-gated potassium channels, this is achieved largely through phosphorylation rather than chronic alterations in gene expression (Chambard and Ashmore, 2005;Kaczmarek et al, 2005;Macica et al, 2003;Song et al, 2005). Studies in the avian cochlear nucleus (nucleus magnocellularis) have shown large deafness-related changes in Kv1.1 and Kv3.1 expression following cochlear ablation (Lu et al, 2004;von Hehn et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%