2002
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m110547200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of the Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway by SHP2

Abstract: Gab1-SHP2 association is required for Erk mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by several growth factors. Gab1-SHP2 interaction activates SHP2. However, an activated SHP2 still needs to associate with Gab1 to mediate Erk activation. It was unclear whether SHP2 is required to dephosphorylate a negative phosphorylation site on Gab1 or whether SHP2 needs the Gab1 pleckstrin homology (PH) domain to target it to the plasma membrane. We found that expression of a fusion protein consisting of the Gab1 PH domai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
108
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
108
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…SRC and SHP2, two putative Tyr-567 interactors, are likely to be upstream activators of MAPKs in KIT signaling (37,43). We observed that SOCS6 partially inhibited ERK and p38 FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…SRC and SHP2, two putative Tyr-567 interactors, are likely to be upstream activators of MAPKs in KIT signaling (37,43). We observed that SOCS6 partially inhibited ERK and p38 FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…2g). This fusion protein was shown to constitutively induce MAP kinase activation without extracellular ligand stimulation (42). We found that daSHP2-transfected MDCK cells were capable of forming tubular structures in collagen gels in the absence of HGF/SF (Fig.…”
Section: Phps1mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Activity of this phosphatase is often associated with increased signaling activity (43,44). This phosphatase was highly phosphorylated on Y 62 and Y 584 in AKT/AR and AKT/ ERG tumors, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%