2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03404.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of the central glycolytic genes in Bacillus subtilis: binding of the repressor CggR to its single DNA target sequence is modulated by fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphate

Abstract: SummaryGlycolysis is one of the best and widely conserved general metabolic pathways. Bacillus subtilis enzymes catalysing the central part of glycolysis, gathering the steps of interconversion of the triose phosphates from dihydroxyacetone-phosphate to phosphoenolpyruvate, are encoded by five genes, gapA , pgk , tpi , pgm and eno . They are transcribed in a hexacistronic operon together with cggR , the first cistron, encoding the repressor of this gapA operon. Using deletion analysis, we have localized the Cg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
128
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The in vivo concentration of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (FBP) increases upon active transport of glucose through the PTS, which diminishes CggR binding ability as to its cis-sequence, CggR being unable to function as a repressor. 126) In contrast, an increase in gluconeogenesis is achieved by relief from CcpN repression of gapB and pckA, specific to gluconeogenesis, in the interaction of CcpN with active YqfL (indicated in blue). 127) The CcpC protein represses the expression of the citB and citZCH operons.…”
Section: Catabolite Control Mediated By Ccpb Ccpc Ccpn and Cggrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The in vivo concentration of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (FBP) increases upon active transport of glucose through the PTS, which diminishes CggR binding ability as to its cis-sequence, CggR being unable to function as a repressor. 126) In contrast, an increase in gluconeogenesis is achieved by relief from CcpN repression of gapB and pckA, specific to gluconeogenesis, in the interaction of CcpN with active YqfL (indicated in blue). 127) The CcpC protein represses the expression of the citB and citZCH operons.…”
Section: Catabolite Control Mediated By Ccpb Ccpc Ccpn and Cggrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcription of the entire gapA operon from the gapA promoter is repressed by CggR, resulting in the gapA-pgk-tpi-pgm-eno transcript due to endonucleolytic cleavage between cggR and gapA, although the pgk-tpi-pgm-eno transcript is constitutively formed from another promoter in the intergenic region between gapA and pgk. 126,136) FBP is an inhibitor of CggR activity. 126) FBP, in the millimolar range, reduces CggR binding to its cis-sequence which is located downstream of the gapA promoter.…”
Section: Catabolite Control Mediated By Ccpb Ccpc Ccpn and Cggrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like many bacterial counterparts, the Xcc GAPDH acquits its enzymic activity by using NAD + specifically as a cofactor. However, differing from the observation that the expression of the gap gene is induced by glucose in Streptomyces aureofaciens, E. coli and B. subtilis (Kormanec et al, 1997;Charpentier et al, 1998;Tobisch et al, 1999;Doan & Aymerich, 2003), the Xcc gapA gene seems to be constitutively expressed. We have also demonstrated that inactivation of the Xcc GAPDH results in impairment of bacterial growth and virulence in the host plant, deficiency of the capability to utilize various carbohydrates, and reduction of ATP and EPS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The cggR gene encodes the repressor of the hexacistronic gapA operon, which includes the cggR, gapA, pgk, tpi, pgm and eno genes. As documented by Doan & Aymerich (2003), binding of the CggR repressor to its single DNA target sequence is modulated by fructose 1,6-bisphosphate. Importantly, the cggR and ptsG expression profiles are known to be very similar (Doan & Aymerich, 2003).…”
Section: Monitoring Promoter Activity By Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%