2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of synaptic structure and function by palmitoylated AMPA receptor binding protein

Abstract: AMPA receptor binding protein (ABP) is a multi-PDZ domain scaffold that binds and stabilizes AMPA receptor (AMPAR) GluR2/3 subunits at synapses. A palmitoylated N-terminal splice variant (pABP-L) concentrates in spine heads, whereas a non-palmitoylated form (ABP-L) is intracellular. We show that postsynaptic sindbisviral expression of pABP-L increased AMPAR mediated mEPSC amplitude and frequency and elevated surface levels of GluR1 and GluR2, suggesting an increase in AMPA receptors at individual synapses. Spi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, DHHC5 targets GRIP1bwt, but not the palmitoylation mutant GRIP1b-C11S, to similar dendritic puncta. Notably, though, the endosomal targeting of palmitoylated GRIP1b is distinct from the synaptic targeting described for the closely related palmitoylated GRIP2b (DeSouza et al, 2002; Misra et al, 2010). Consistent with these reports, we also observed prominent GRIP2b targeting to dendritic spines, which did not require DHHC5 or DHHC8 co-expression (not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, DHHC5 targets GRIP1bwt, but not the palmitoylation mutant GRIP1b-C11S, to similar dendritic puncta. Notably, though, the endosomal targeting of palmitoylated GRIP1b is distinct from the synaptic targeting described for the closely related palmitoylated GRIP2b (DeSouza et al, 2002; Misra et al, 2010). Consistent with these reports, we also observed prominent GRIP2b targeting to dendritic spines, which did not require DHHC5 or DHHC8 co-expression (not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The spines facilitate throughput of the excitatory signal to the dendritic trunk while at the same time constraining features, such as local calcium influx, to mediate synapse-specific effects (Fiala et al, 1998; Yuste et al, 1999; Sheng and Hoogenraad, 2007; Yuste, 2011). Numerous molecular mechanisms have been shown to promote the formation, localization, and stabilization of dendritic spines (Tolias et al, 2005; Xie et al, 2007; Tran et al, 2009; Lai and Ip, 2009; Han et al, 2010; Misra et al, 2010). Recently it has been reported that adult mice lacking a major class of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), namely β2-containing heteropentameric receptors (β2*-nAChRs), have altered numbers of dendritic spines in a variety of cortical regions in brain (Ballesteros-Yanez et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GluR1 surface levels were increased in the presence of phospho-deficient δ-catenin. Although δ-catenin is not associated with GluR1 at its PDZ-binding domain by interaction with GRIP/ABP, it has been reported previously that heteromerization of GluR1/2 may be responsible for increased surface GluR1 with upregulation of GluR2 surface expression (Misra et al, 2010). It would also be interesting to determine whether the other AMPA receptors GluR3 and GluR4 are affected by this phenomenon as a result of heteromerization with GluR2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%