1984
DOI: 10.1002/mus.880070213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of sarcomere number in skeletal muscle: A comparison of hypotheses

Abstract: Sarcomere lengths from 16 locations in the muscles of mastication were measured from pigs fixed in maximum excursion (wide jaw opening) and in postural position (near occlusion). These data, plus published data on sarcomere lengths in rabbit jaw muscles, were used to evaluate conflicting hypotheses about the factors which regulate serial sarcomere number in striated muscles. According to the most successful hypothesis, sarcomere number is adjusted so as to achieve an optimum sarcomere length when the muscle is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
1
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(2 reference statements)
5
72
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The functional length of a muscle is important to influence on its contractile properties [18][19][20] and to determine if the muscle adds or loses sarcomeres 20,21 . In the present study, only the immobilized and stretched group with previous therapeutic ultrasound with 0.5W/cm 2 dose did not present statistically significant difference concerning the quantity of sarcomeres in series and muscular length, when compared with the immobilized and non-immobilized muscles were compared; that is to say, this dose associated with stretching presented positive effects concerning recovery of the deleterious effects caused by immobilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional length of a muscle is important to influence on its contractile properties [18][19][20] and to determine if the muscle adds or loses sarcomeres 20,21 . In the present study, only the immobilized and stretched group with previous therapeutic ultrasound with 0.5W/cm 2 dose did not present statistically significant difference concerning the quantity of sarcomeres in series and muscular length, when compared with the immobilized and non-immobilized muscles were compared; that is to say, this dose associated with stretching presented positive effects concerning recovery of the deleterious effects caused by immobilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research focus is appropriate given that food mechanical properties can modulate both jaw-muscle activity (Agrawal et al, 1998;Woda et al, 2006) and bone loading (Hylander, 1979) during ingestion and mastication. Alternatively, studies of sarcomere lengths in mammalian jaw muscles often focus on physiological relationships such as how manipulated or representative jaw movements impact sarcomere length and, hence, peak muscle forces (Anapol and Herring, 1989;Carlson, 1977;Herring et al, 1984;Mackenna and Turker, 1978;Nordstrom et al, 1974;Thexton and Hiiemae, 1975;Weijs et al, 1989;Weijs and van der Wielen-Drent, 1983;Weijs et al, 1982). The lack of behavioral and ecological specificity in these studies makes it more difficult to understand the implications of sarcomere length variation for mammalian jaw-muscle evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, muscle attachment located on the clavicle has more variety [18]. Thus, it seems that muscle length determines motion range to the greatest extent, while its architecture determines muscle function and motion control [16,26,41]. Muscle formation, including such parameters as the length of its contractile part, tendon length or attachment width, depends both on genetic factors and on the type of work it does [16,17,31,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%