1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02214021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of reproduction in the neotropical ponerine ant,Pachycondyla villosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, larvae have been shown to affect worker reproduction in at least two species. In the honey bee, A. mellifera, larvae inhibit worker ovarian activation (19)(20)(21)(22)(23), and in the ant Pachycondyla apicalis larvae affect worker reproduction in queenless groups (31). However, in these cases larvae do not directly signal queen presence; therefore, this regulation mechanism clearly differs from the mechanism described in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Nevertheless, larvae have been shown to affect worker reproduction in at least two species. In the honey bee, A. mellifera, larvae inhibit worker ovarian activation (19)(20)(21)(22)(23), and in the ant Pachycondyla apicalis larvae affect worker reproduction in queenless groups (31). However, in these cases larvae do not directly signal queen presence; therefore, this regulation mechanism clearly differs from the mechanism described in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Thus our data confirm the inferences of Franks and Scovell (1983) that dominance interactions are important in this species. Dominance hierarchies have also been found among workers of other formicoxenine species such as Leptothorax species (Cole, 1981) and the slave-makers Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Bourke, 1988 a) and Chalepoxenus muellerianus (Heinze, 1996 a). The strong correlations between dominance rank and reproductive potential (Table 5) are suggestive, but we cannot yet determine cause and effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Worker reproduction among social insects is well documented but relatively poorly understood (Crozier and Pamilo, 1996). Heinze (1996 b) noticed that the capacity for worker reproduction (as measured by ovarian development) is especially high for the specialised slave-making ants, a class of social parasites that exploit the labour force of other species. The slave-maker Protomognathus americanus parasitizes three different Leptothorax species (L. longispinosus, L. curvispinosus and L. ambiguus).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the major advantages that have promoted the evolution of cannibalistic behaviour may be reduction of competition by killing intraspecific competitors and acquisition of nutrients when availability and quality of food plants or interspecific prey is low (Elgar and Crespi, 1992;Mafro-Net0 and Jolivet, 1996). Egg cannibalism in social insects may contribute to maintenance of social dominance hierarchies (Kukuk, 1992;Heinze et al, 1996). Furthermore, egg cannibalism by neonate larvae may provide the larvae with (additional) endosymbionts that have been added to the eggs (see e.g.…”
Section: Chemical Defence and Egg Cannibalismmentioning
confidence: 99%