2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Poly(A) Tail and Translation during the Somatic Cell Cycle

Abstract: Poly(A) tails are critical for mRNA stability and translation. However, recent studies have challenged this view, showing that poly(A) tail length and translation efficiency are decoupled in non-embryonic cells. Using TAIL-seq and ribosome profiling, we investigate poly(A) tail dynamics and translational control in the somatic cell cycle. We find dramatic changes in poly(A) tail lengths of cell-cycle regulatory genes like CDK1, TOP2A, and FBXO5, explaining their translational repression in M phase. We also fin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

15
184
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(67 reference statements)
15
184
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) [23]. This is consistent with the recent findings that the median length of poly(A) tails is 50–100 nt in mammalian cells, which is shorter than previously thought (150–250 nt), and that additional poly(A) tail elongation does not further contribute to translational enhancement except on maternal mRNAs [33,34,35]. Thus, if cytoplasmic polyadenylation by PAPOLB governs spermiogenesis, it is expected that the “true” target(s) possesses maternal mRNA-like short poly(A) tail(s).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…1) [23]. This is consistent with the recent findings that the median length of poly(A) tails is 50–100 nt in mammalian cells, which is shorter than previously thought (150–250 nt), and that additional poly(A) tail elongation does not further contribute to translational enhancement except on maternal mRNAs [33,34,35]. Thus, if cytoplasmic polyadenylation by PAPOLB governs spermiogenesis, it is expected that the “true” target(s) possesses maternal mRNA-like short poly(A) tail(s).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Using in vitro translation and m 7 GTP cap-affinity pulldown assays, we do not find general cap-dependent translation regulation by 4E-BP1 S83 phosphorylation. Although we did not find S83 phosphorylation affecting general cap-binding or capdependent translation, we cannot exclude the possibility that an mRNA subpopulation is regulated by S83-phosphorylated 4E-BP1, such as terminal oligopyrimidine tract (TOP)-containing mRNAs that are reported to be translationally active during mitosis (43). A recent study shows that the interaction between the C-terminal loop with eIF4E is required for eIF4F complex formation and translation repression in vivo using 4E-BP1 truncation mutants, which, in light of our results, prompts the examination of other loop residues (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…7). The fact that Mtr4/ZFC3H1 substrates have long poly(A) tails, which is in contrast to NEXT targets that largely lack poly(A) tails (Meola et al 2016), may help explain their efficient ribosome association (Peng et al 2008;Park et al 2016). It is noteworthy that although eRNAs are largely nonpolyadenylated (Djebali et al 2012;Andersson et al 2014a), we recently identified a class of poly(A) + eRNAs that are stabilized by Mtr4/ZFC3H1 knockdown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%