2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Mother-to-Offspring Transmission of mtDNA Heteroplasmy

Abstract: Highlights d Wild-type mtDNA heteroplasmy is sensed in oocyte maturation and embryo development d Random versus selective mtDNA segregation is driven by the nuclear genetic context d Haplotype-derived OXPHOS differences and ROS signaling define the preferred mtDNA d Efficiency of iPSC generation strongly depends on the mtDNA haplotype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
82
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To attempt to extend this result for ρ+ mutant cells, we used two independent ρ+ recipient cybrid cells generated with different nuclear and mitochondrial DNA origins. A recent study showed that nucleus-mitochondrial genome (mtDNA-nDNA) interactions control mtDNA heteroplasmy 47 . Therefore, we tested whether recipient cells with mismatched or matched endogenous mtDNA-nDNA pair origins integrate exogenous mtDNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To attempt to extend this result for ρ+ mutant cells, we used two independent ρ+ recipient cybrid cells generated with different nuclear and mitochondrial DNA origins. A recent study showed that nucleus-mitochondrial genome (mtDNA-nDNA) interactions control mtDNA heteroplasmy 47 . Therefore, we tested whether recipient cells with mismatched or matched endogenous mtDNA-nDNA pair origins integrate exogenous mtDNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the mutation rate of mtDNA is significantly higher than that of nuclear DNA (Allio et al, 2017; Khrapko et al, 1997) this increased replication most likely leads to an increased mutation load. A number of mechanisms have been proposed to reduce this mutation load, such as the bottleneck effect, purifying selection or biased segregation of mtDNA haplotypes (Burgstaller et al, 2014; Johnston et al, 2015; Latorre-Pellicer et al, 2019; Lee et al, 2012; Sharpley et al, 2012; Zhang et al, 2018). However, despite these mechanisms, inheritable mtDNA based diseases are reported with a prevalence of 5-15 cases per 100,000 individuals (Burgstaller et al, 2015; Gorman et al, 2016), highlighting both the importance and limitations of these selection mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fully understand the pathogenic mechanisms of mitochondrial diseases, it is also necessary to remind the key differences between the Mendelian rules governing nDNA genetics and the mtDNA genetics, which essentially is a population genetics of a multicopy genome [7,12]. Key mtDNA features in this respect include the following: Maternal inheritance of mtDNA [19], despite some debate on exceptions to this rule [20,21] The homoplasmy/heteroplasmy of mtDNA according to a homogenous sequence or to coexisting different sequences and its segregation in somatic tissues and in the germline [22,23] The threshold effect implicating a certain amount of mutant sequences necessary to induce a mitochondrial dysfunction that may vary in a mosaic cellular pattern from tissue to tissue [12] The high mutational rate and frequent fixation of sequence variants under different levels of selection [24], which ultimately shapes the population‐specific mtDNA haplogroups [25]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%