2010
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e10-02-0083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Microtubule Dynamics by Bim1 and Bik1, the Budding Yeast Members of the EB1 and CLIP-170 Families of Plus-End Tracking Proteins

Abstract: Bim1 promotes microtubule assembly in vitro, primarily by decreasing the frequency of catastrophes. In contrast, Bik1 inhibits microtubule assembly by slowing growth and, consequently, promoting catastrophes. These proteins interact to form a complex that affects microtubule dynamics in much the same way as Bim1 alone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…homodimers that interact to create a tetramer that in turn binds microtubule plus ends (Blake-Hodek et al 2010). Combinatorial interactions among the different MAPS provide a mechanism to increase the number of distinct activities from a limited number of proteins.…”
Section: Microtubule-associated Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…homodimers that interact to create a tetramer that in turn binds microtubule plus ends (Blake-Hodek et al 2010). Combinatorial interactions among the different MAPS provide a mechanism to increase the number of distinct activities from a limited number of proteins.…”
Section: Microtubule-associated Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End-binding proteins recognize a tubulin conformation unique to the growing ends of MTs and can affect the dynamics of plusends by intrinsically altering the structure of the MT end (6)(7)(8) as well as recruiting other interacting proteins (9). In contrast, TOG domain-containing proteins, such as XMAP215, promote MT growth and have been suggested to act as MT "polymerases" (10,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diverse functions of MTs are made possible through the action of motors (i.e., kinesin and dynein) and nonmotor MT-associated proteins (MAPs) that tightly regulate the MT network. Some of these proteins act by binding directly to the ends of MTs, either to the highly dynamic plus end, such as the conserved end-binding proteins (9,10), or to the minus end (11,12). Other MT regulators, such as MAP1 and MAP2/Tau, bind along the MT lattice, stabilizing it and helping build parallel arrays, most notably in axons (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%