2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of foot and ankle quasi-stiffness during human hopping across a range of frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, some recent studies (e.g. Kessler et al 2020) have reported that using a rigid-body foot model (as done in this study) could lead to an overestimation of ankle joint power, thus affecting Achilles tendon mechanical work estimates. One other limitation is the estimation of GM forces based on reported values of relative PCSA, assuming consistent force contribution at all running speeds and a negligible inter-muscular force transmission between the individual plantar flexor muscles.…”
Section: Methodological Limitations and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, some recent studies (e.g. Kessler et al 2020) have reported that using a rigid-body foot model (as done in this study) could lead to an overestimation of ankle joint power, thus affecting Achilles tendon mechanical work estimates. One other limitation is the estimation of GM forces based on reported values of relative PCSA, assuming consistent force contribution at all running speeds and a negligible inter-muscular force transmission between the individual plantar flexor muscles.…”
Section: Methodological Limitations and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, there is substantial motion that occurs in the arch during this phase, which conflicts with the description of the foot as a rigid lever, as has been recently questioned by several researchers [14,25]. While this study lacks kinetic data to measure dynamic stiffness of the arch, previous studies have shown that the windlass mechanism does not stiffen the foot [26][27][28], and that the arch is more compliant in late stance than in the first half of stance [14]. Therefore, we propose that the arch complex is best described as a dynamic lever rather than a rigid lever, as it provides a stable base of support for push-off, with a constantly changing lever arm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Recently, multi-segment kinetic foot models have received increasing attention in methodological and clinical studies, providing new insights into the individual power distributions of the intrinsic foot joints [10][11][12]. These kinetic foot models further highlighted the shortcomings of computing ankle joint moments and power with a one-segment foot modeling approach, as it overestimates ankle joint power [12][13][14]. These shortcomings may further lead to clinical misinterpretation of how a therapeutic intervention benefits or degrades biomechanical performance, as the estimated changes simply reflect methodological errors inherent to conventionally modeling the foot as a single segment [12,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%